Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Indiana Mills & Manufacturing Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This portfolio is distributed across 2 distinct art units, suggesting a specialized focus within the broader mechanical sector. The presence of distinct examiners for each case indicates that the pending matters are being handled by different individuals, which prevents any single examiner from having a disproportionate impact on the overall prosecution timeline.
Among the active personnel, ADAMS, NATHANIEL L is identified as the busiest examiner for this company. This specific examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the workload is split, the identified busiest examiner and another professional share the current responsibilities. This distribution across art units and examiners reflects a decentralized prosecution landscape. Practitioners should prepare for varied feedback styles, as the lack of examiner concentration means that successful arguments in a single case may not necessarily influence the other pending matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAMS, NATHANIEL L | 1 | 71.4% | +20.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18850854 | RATCHETING WEB RETRACTOR WITH RELEASABLE WEB TENSION LIMITER | ADAMS, NATHANIEL L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3654 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18850854 | RATCHETING WEB RETRACTOR WITH RELEASABLE WEB TENSION LIMITER | ADAMS, NATHANIEL L | 3654 | §102 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 25, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial