Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
6 pending office actions • 6 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (67%) |
| §112 only | 1 (17%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUMMEL, JULIA L | 1 | 34.5% | +52.2% |
| STANEK, KELSEY L | 1 | 80.6% | +15.8% |
| GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL | 1 | 69.6% | +42.9% |
| GOFF II, JOHN L | 1 | 59.3% | +30.7% |
| BAKER, LORI LYNN | 1 | 78.6% | +6.9% |
| STOUT, RILEY OWEN | 1 | 76.0% | +0.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18999584 | MANUAL INFLATION AND DEFLATION ADJUSTMENT STRUCTURE FOR A PUMP | STANEK, KELSEY L | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18737210 | AUTOMATED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING AN INFLATABLE PRODUCT | GOFF II, JOHN L | 14d |
| 18999584 | MANUAL INFLATION AND DEFLATION ADJUSTMENT STRUCTURE FOR A PUMP | STANEK, KELSEY L | 29d |
| 18723933 | MULTI-CHAMBER INFLATABLE PRODUCT WITH AN INTERNAL PRESSURE REGULATING STRUCTURE | GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL | 29d |
| 19318878 | INTERNAL TENSIONING STRUCTURE USEABLE WITH INFLATABLE DEVICES | RUMMEL, JULIA L | 70d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1784 | 1 |
| 3741 | 1 |
| 3673 | 1 |
| 1746 | 1 |
| 3754 | 1 |
| 2834 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19318878 | INTERNAL TENSIONING STRUCTURE USEABLE WITH INFLATABLE DEVICES | RUMMEL, JULIA L | 1784 | §103 | Final Rejection | 70d | Pending | Sep 04, 2025 |
| 18999584 | MANUAL INFLATION AND DEFLATION ADJUSTMENT STRUCTURE FOR A PUMP | STANEK, KELSEY L | 3741 | §112 | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | Dec 23, 2024 |
| 18723933 | MULTI-CHAMBER INFLATABLE PRODUCT WITH AN INTERNAL PRESSURE REGULATING STRUCTURE | GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL | 3673 | §103 | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | Jun 25, 2024 |
| 18737210 | AUTOMATED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING AN INFLATABLE PRODUCT | GOFF II, JOHN L | 1746 | §103 | Final Rejection | 14d | Pending | Jun 07, 2024 |
| 17848442 | INFLATABLE SPA | BAKER, LORI LYNN | 3754 | Other | Non-Final OA | 1065d overdue | Pending | Jun 24, 2022 |
| 17299526 | ROTOR ASSEMBLIES OF WATER PUMPS | STOUT, RILEY OWEN | 2834 | §103 | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | Jun 03, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial