Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days
Itrec B.V. has 2 pending office actions distributed across the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, showing a lack of examiner overlap in the current workload. This distribution suggests that the company is pursuing diverse technical applications that do not fall under 1 specialized examiner's jurisdiction.
OQUENDO, CARIB A is identified as the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action. This 1 action represents a portion of the 2 total pending office actions, suggesting that while the portfolio is small, its prosecution is technically dispersed within the USPTO structure. Practitioners must manage 2 distinct examiners, as the 2 distinct art units involved likely apply different examination standards or prior art focuses to the 2 pending office actions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OQUENDO, CARIB A | 1 | 77.9% | +12.4% |
| CAMPOS JR, JUAN J | 1 | 68.9% | +19.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18728658 | CRANE AND METHOD FOR HANDLING OF ONE OR MORE WIND TURBINE COMPONENTS | CAMPOS JR, JUAN J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18857005 | METHOD FOR INSTALLATION OF AN OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE FOUNDATION MONOPILE | OQUENDO, CARIB A | — |
| 18728658 | CRANE AND METHOD FOR HANDLING OF ONE OR MORE WIND TURBINE COMPONENTS | CAMPOS JR, JUAN J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3678 | 1 |
| 3654 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18857005 | METHOD FOR INSTALLATION OF AN OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE FOUNDATION MONOPILE | OQUENDO, CARIB A | 3678 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 15, 2024 |
| 18728658 | CRANE AND METHOD FOR HANDLING OF ONE OR MORE WIND TURBINE COMPONENTS | CAMPOS JR, JUAN J | 3654 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial