Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Jbt Marel Corporation

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
§102 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PARSLEY, DAVID J 1 53.8% +28.5%
NGUYEN, PHUONG T 1 73.8% +36.7%
CHEN, CHANGRU 1 48.3% +42.7%
CROSBY JR, RICHARD D 1 68.7% +16.4%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17645355 SYSTEM OF CUTTING A HOMOGENEOUS WORK PRODUCT INTO NATURAL SHAPES WITH RANDOMNESS CROSBY JR, RICHARD D 38d overdue
17906463 CONTAINER AND LOAD BASKET FOR THERMAL MANAGEMENT FOR PROCESSING IN HIGH PRESSURE APPLICATION CHEN, CHANGRU 30d overdue
18910988 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING WORKPIECES PARSLEY, DAVID J 5d overdue
18300129 PORK BELLY PROCESSING NGUYEN, PHUONG T 84d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3643 1
3761 1
1796 1
3724 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18910988 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING WORKPIECES PARSLEY, DAVID J 3643 §103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Oct 09, 2024
18300129 PORK BELLY PROCESSING NGUYEN, PHUONG T 3761 §102 Non-Final OA 84d Pending Apr 13, 2023
17906463 CONTAINER AND LOAD BASKET FOR THERMAL MANAGEMENT FOR PROCESSING IN HIGH PRESSURE APPLICATION CHEN, CHANGRU 1796 §103 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Sep 15, 2022
17645355 SYSTEM OF CUTTING A HOMOGENEOUS WORK PRODUCT INTO NATURAL SHAPES WITH RANDOMNESS CROSBY JR, RICHARD D 3724 §103 Non-Final OA 38d overdue Pending Dec 21, 2021

Managing Jbt Marel Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month