Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Jiangmen Moore Technology Ltd.

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MOORE, STEPHANIE LYNN 1 60.8% +37.4%
DELACRUZ, MADELEINE PAULINA 1 63.3% +40.0%
MITCHUM, DREW JOSEPH 1 100.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18088956 HEATING ASSEMBLY AND AEROSOL-GENERATION DEVICE MITCHUM, DREW JOSEPH 16d overdue
18342014 HEATING BODY AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, VAPORIZER, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE DELACRUZ, MADELEINE PAULINA

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18343343 VAPORIZER AND ELECTRONIC VAPORIZATION DEVICE MOORE, STEPHANIE LYNN 69d
18342014 HEATING BODY AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, VAPORIZER, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE DELACRUZ, MADELEINE PAULINA

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1747 1
1755 1
3761 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18343343 VAPORIZER AND ELECTRONIC VAPORIZATION DEVICE MOORE, STEPHANIE LYNN 1747 §103 Final Rejection 69d Pending Jun 28, 2023
18342014 HEATING BODY AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, VAPORIZER, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE DELACRUZ, MADELEINE PAULINA 1755 §102§103 Final Rejection Pending Jun 27, 2023
18088956 HEATING ASSEMBLY AND AEROSOL-GENERATION DEVICE MITCHUM, DREW JOSEPH 3761 §102§112 Non-Final OA 16d overdue Pending Dec 27, 2022

Managing Jiangmen Moore Technology Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month