Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Jointmedica Ltd. manages a company patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio currently features 1 pending office action. This workload is managed by 1 distinct examiner operating within 1 distinct art unit. This structure indicates that the company's current legal interactions are limited to a single administrative channel.
Robert A Vetere serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. He is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since the total count of pending office actions is 1, this examiner is responsible for all active prosecution matters for the company. This concentration suggests that the prosecution strategy is currently focused on a very narrow administrative path. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company faces a consolidated review process for its active filing. Practitioners can expect a singular point of contact within the USPTO for these specific proceedings.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VETERE, ROBERT A | 1 | 61.4% | +12.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19197149 | METHOD FOR MAKING PROSTHETIC DEVICE | VETERE, ROBERT A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1712 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19197149 | METHOD FOR MAKING PROSTHETIC DEVICE | VETERE, ROBERT A | 1712 | §103DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 02, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial