Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Kansas State University Research Foundation

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

12 pending office actions • 11 art units • 12 examiners • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 22 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kansas State University Research Foundation has 12 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These cases are assigned to 12 distinct examiners, ensuring that no single examiner is managing more than 1 pending action. This distribution across 12 distinct examiners is paired with 11 distinct art units, showing a wide technical footprint for the university's research. This distribution requires the applicant to manage 12 separate prosecution timelines simultaneously.

The busiest examiner, BAZARGANI, ARYA AHMADI, is currently handling 1 pending office action. Because the 12 pending office actions are spread across 11 distinct art units, the prosecution requires addressing the specific requirements of nearly a dozen different specialized groups. This structure suggests that the 12 distinct examiners are largely operating independently within their respective units. The involvement of 12 distinct examiners means that the university must be prepared for 12 unique approaches to prior art rejections.

Because the 12 pending office actions are spread across 11 distinct art units, practitioners must monitor for potential conflicts in prosecution across different technical divisions. This broad distribution underscores the complexity of the university's current engagement with the USPTO. The 12 pending office actions represent a significant workload that requires careful coordination to ensure consistent claim language across the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals portfolio. The lack of concentration under a single examiner means that each case requires a unique strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (50%)
5
Medium (42%)
1
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (17%)
§112 only1 (8%)
Double-patenting + other3 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

10
Life Sciences
83% of docket
1
Information Tech
8% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
8% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BAZARGANI, ARYA AHMADI 1 62.5% +31.3%
WANG, RUIXUE 1 55.9% +19.0%
KUMAR, VINOD 1 82.8% +20.3%
DUFFY, PATRICIA ANN 1 52.9% +33.9%
SABILA, MERCY HELLEN 1 57.5% +45.3%
WATTS, JENNA A 1 48.6% +54.0%
SALVOZA, M FRANCO G 1 68.2% +30.6%
HAWKINS, AMANDA SALATA 1 15.4% +40.9%
BERNATZ, KEVIN M 1 87.8% +12.3%
KWIATKOWSKA, LIDIA 1 68.9% +20.2%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18924027 DEVELOPMENT OF MOSAIC VACCINES AGAINST FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS SEROTYPE ASIA WANG, RUIXUE —
18913587 ANTIVIRAL HAIRPIN CONSTRUCTS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF KUMAR, VINOD —
18841203 ANAPLASMA VACCINES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF DUFFY, PATRICIA ANN —
18720832 ECO-FRIENDLY ADDITIVES FOR HAY AND SILAGE INOCULANTS MINIMIZING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS WATTS, JENNA A —
18417359 CHEMICAL MITIGANTS IN ANIMAL FEED AND FEED INGREDIENTS HAWKINS, AMANDA SALATA —
18476651 ELECTROCHEMICAL CATALYSTS FOR FUEL CELLS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME BERNATZ, KEVIN M —
17559397 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AN AGRICULTURAL APPLICATOR AHMED, ISTIAQUE —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18131739 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AN AGRICULTURAL APPLICATOR KWIATKOWSKA, LIDIA 26d
18860868 CORRALLING AMPHIPATHIC PEPTIDE COLLOIDS BAZARGANI, ARYA AHMADI —
18924027 DEVELOPMENT OF MOSAIC VACCINES AGAINST FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS SEROTYPE ASIA WANG, RUIXUE —
18913587 ANTIVIRAL HAIRPIN CONSTRUCTS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF KUMAR, VINOD —
18841203 ANAPLASMA VACCINES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF DUFFY, PATRICIA ANN —
18722010 CYCLIC PEPTIDE FOR CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY SABILA, MERCY HELLEN —
18720832 ECO-FRIENDLY ADDITIVES FOR HAY AND SILAGE INOCULANTS MINIMIZING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS WATTS, JENNA A —
18547842 BOVINE VIRAL DIARRHEA VIRUS IMMUNOGENIC COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF SALVOZA, M FRANCO G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1672 2
1613 1
1663 1
1645 1
1654 1
1791 1
1793 1
1735 1
3666 1
1614 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18860868 CORRALLING AMPHIPATHIC PEPTIDE COLLOIDS BAZARGANI, ARYA AHMADI 1613 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 28, 2024
18924027 DEVELOPMENT OF MOSAIC VACCINES AGAINST FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS SEROTYPE ASIA WANG, RUIXUE 1672 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2024
18913587 ANTIVIRAL HAIRPIN CONSTRUCTS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF KUMAR, VINOD 1663 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18841203 ANAPLASMA VACCINES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF DUFFY, PATRICIA ANN 1645 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 23, 2024
18722010 CYCLIC PEPTIDE FOR CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY SABILA, MERCY HELLEN 1654 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2024
18720832 ECO-FRIENDLY ADDITIVES FOR HAY AND SILAGE INOCULANTS MINIMIZING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS WATTS, JENNA A 1791 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2024
18547842 BOVINE VIRAL DIARRHEA VIRUS IMMUNOGENIC COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF SALVOZA, M FRANCO G 1672 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 18, 2024
18417359 CHEMICAL MITIGANTS IN ANIMAL FEED AND FEED INGREDIENTS HAWKINS, AMANDA SALATA 1793 §103§112DP Final Rejection — Pending Jan 19, 2024
18476651 ELECTROCHEMICAL CATALYSTS FOR FUEL CELLS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME BERNATZ, KEVIN M 1735 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 28, 2023
18131739 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AN AGRICULTURAL APPLICATOR KWIATKOWSKA, LIDIA 3666 §103 Final Rejection 26d Pending Apr 06, 2023
17997276 ENCAPSULATED COMPOSITIONS AND USE OF OCTENYLSUCCINIC ANHYDRIDE STARCH AS EMULSIFYING AGENT PRAGANI, RAJAN 1614 §103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Oct 27, 2022
17559397 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AN AGRICULTURAL APPLICATOR AHMED, ISTIAQUE 2116 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 22, 2021

Managing Kansas State University Research Foundation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kansas State University Research Foundation have?

Kansas State University Research Foundation has 12 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 11 art units and 12 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kansas State University Research Foundation applications?

Arya Ahmadi Bazargani has the most, with 1 of Kansas State University Research Foundation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Kansas State University Research Foundation's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month