Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Vinod Kumar, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as KUMAR, VINOD

Tech Center 1600 • Art Units: 1638 1662 1663

This examiner grants 83% of resolved cases

Analysis

KUMAR, VINOD works in tech center 1600 and art unit 1638. The profile records 1444 resolved cases and an allowance rate of 82.8%. Interview lift is 20.3%, indicating that interviews can provide useful support during prosecution. The median time to allowance is 779 days, giving applicants a defined basis for timing responses, continuation filings, and portfolio reviews.

The leading companies are Stine Seed Farm Inc., Syngenta AG, and Pioneer Hi-bred International Inc. The listed firms are DENTONS US LLP, Casimir Jones, S.C., and MCKEE, VOORHEES & SEASE, P.L.C. Practitioners may prepare targeted interviews that complement a disciplined written strategy and preserve clear distinctions over the cited art.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

82.8%
Allow Rate
+22.8% vs TC avg
1,475
Total Applications
+20.3%
Interview Lift
779
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 1444 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

6.7%
§101 Eligibility
16.4%
§102 Novelty
21.9%
§103 Obviousness
48.6%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18909405 METHODS FOR CLONAL PLANT PRODUCTION Non-Final OA PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC.
18974347 PLANT CELLS AND PLANTS MODIFIED TO INCREASE RESISTANCE TO NECROTROPHS OR DROUGHT AND METHODS OF SELECTING AND USING THE SAME Non-Final OA WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION
17775955 METHODS OF IN PLANTA TRANSFORMATION USING AXILLARY MERISTEM Final Rejection SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG
17772754 METHODS OF TRANSFORMATION Final Rejection SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG
18495731 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IN VIVO DIRECT GENOME EDITING IN PLANTS Final Rejection The Regents of the University of California
18703773 PLANT GENOME EDITING METHODS Non-Final OA INARI AGRICULTURE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
19188485 PLANT REGULATORY ELEMENTS AND USES THEREOF FOR AUTOEXCISION Final Rejection Monsanto Technology LLC
18844878 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PRODUCING TOBACCO PLANTS WITH REDUCED NICOTINIC ALKALOID LEVELS Non-Final OA North Carolina State University
18913587 ANTIVIRAL HAIRPIN CONSTRUCTS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF Non-Final OA Kansas State University Research Foundation

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Vinod Kumar's allowance rate?

82.8% of resolved applications examined by Vinod Kumar were allowed (1,444 resolved cases), compared with 48.8% across Art Unit 1638 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Vinod Kumar?

This examiner's interview lift is +20.3 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Vinod Kumar take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Vinod Kumar took 779 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Vinod Kumar work in?

Vinod Kumar examines applications in Art Unit 1638 in Tech Center 1600 (Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month