Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Leeno Industrial Inc.

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Leeno Industrial Inc. is currently addressing 2 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This suggests that the company's filings are diverse enough to trigger reviews from different specialized groups within the patent office. The presence of 2 pending office actions indicates an active, albeit small, prosecution cycle. Because the company is working within 2 distinct art units, the technical requirements and prior art landscapes may vary significantly between the two matters.

TRINH, MINH N is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 of the 2 pending office actions under their review. With 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units for only 2 pending actions, there is no overlap in the personnel or the administrative units reviewing the company's work. This requires a flexible prosecution strategy that can adapt to the different expectations of multiple examiners in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector. Each action must be handled as a unique case with no examiner or art unit overlap to provide consistency in the review process. The company's success depends on navigating the specific preferences of both distinct examiners, including TRINH, MINH N, across these separate administrative divisions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ANDREWS, BRENT J 1 77.9% +28.5%
TRINH, MINH N 1 85.5% +9.8%
ZHANG, HAIDONG 1 81.1% +12.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18619080 TEST SOCKET AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME ZHANG, HAIDONG 51d overdue

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18849263 TEST PROBE AND TEST DEVICE ANDREWS, BRENT J —
18637294 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CONTACT TIP AND ELECTROCONDUCTIVE PIN HAVING CONTACT TIP TRINH, MINH N —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18619080 TEST SOCKET AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME ZHANG, HAIDONG 51d overdue
18849263 TEST PROBE AND TEST DEVICE ANDREWS, BRENT J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2858 2
2841 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18849263 TEST PROBE AND TEST DEVICE ANDREWS, BRENT J 2858 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 20, 2024
18637294 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CONTACT TIP AND ELECTROCONDUCTIVE PIN HAVING CONTACT TIP TRINH, MINH N 2841 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 16, 2024
18619080 TEST SOCKET AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME ZHANG, HAIDONG 2858 §103 Non-Final OA 51d overdue Pending Mar 27, 2024

Managing Leeno Industrial Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month