Technology area: Communications
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Logos Space Services Inc. has 4 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. Each of these 4 actions is assigned to a different person, resulting in 4 distinct examiners for the portfolio. These matters are spread across 3 distinct art units, which indicates that the company's communications filings are reviewed by several different technical groups at the USPTO. The distribution across 3 distinct art units suggests that the 4 pending office actions cover a variety of specific communications technologies.
Muthuswamy Ganapathy Manoharan is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending office action. Because there are 4 distinct examiners for the 4 total actions, there is no overlap in examiner assignments. The 3 distinct art units involved show that the 4 pending office actions are distributed across multiple specialized units. This structure requires the company to navigate 4 different individual examination styles. Practitioners should develop unique strategies for each of the 4 pending office actions to address the specific feedback from each assigned examiner within the Communications sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LOUIS-FILS, NICOLE M | 1 | 72.5% | +34.8% |
| MANOHARAN, MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY | 1 | 65.2% | +16.0% |
| LAFONTANT, GARY | 1 | 73.5% | +1.5% |
| VOGEL, JAY L. | 1 | 79.3% | +24.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18919107 | TERMINAL WITH INTERFERENCE AVOIDANCE BETWEEN SATELLITE SYSTEMS USING COMMON SPECTRUM | VOGEL, JAY L. | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19181142 | SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | LOUIS-FILS, NICOLE M | 8d |
| 19181168 | WAVEFORM AND DATA CHARACTERISTICS FOR A TERMINAL OF A SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | MANOHARAN, MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY | 55d |
| 18919107 | TERMINAL WITH INTERFERENCE AVOIDANCE BETWEEN SATELLITE SYSTEMS USING COMMON SPECTRUM | VOGEL, JAY L. | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2641 | 1 |
| 2647 | 1 |
| 2646 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19181142 | SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | LOUIS-FILS, NICOLE M | 2641 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 8d | Pending | Apr 16, 2025 |
| 19181168 | WAVEFORM AND DATA CHARACTERISTICS FOR A TERMINAL OF A SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | MANOHARAN, MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY | 2647 | §103 | Final Rejection | 55d | Pending | Apr 16, 2025 |
| 19181144 | TERMINAL FOR A SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | LAFONTANT, GARY | 2646 | §103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Apr 16, 2025 |
| 18919107 | TERMINAL WITH INTERFERENCE AVOIDANCE BETWEEN SATELLITE SYSTEMS USING COMMON SPECTRUM | VOGEL, JAY L. | — | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 17, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial