Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Lowe'S Companies Inc.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Lowe'S Companies Inc. maintains a company patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio currently has 4 pending office actions, which indicates a stream of ongoing prosecution activity. This volume of 4 pending office actions suggests that the company is actively seeking to expand its intellectual property holdings in this specific technical field.

The prosecution of these actions is spread across 4 distinct examiners but only 2 distinct art units. This distribution is notable because it means that while each of the 4 pending office actions is being reviewed by a different individual, those individuals are clustered within just 2 distinct art units. This suggests that the company's patent applications are technically related enough to be grouped together, yet numerous enough to require 4 distinct examiners.

CHOUDHURY, ZAHID is the busiest examiner for Lowe'S Companies Inc., with 1 pending office action. Given that the busiest examiner pending count is 1 and there are 4 total pending actions, the workload is distributed among the 4 distinct examiners. This lack of concentration with a single examiner means that the company's success is not tied to 1 person's review, but rather to the collective decisions of a group of examiners within the 2 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only2 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
2
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHOUDHURY, ZAHID 1 85.5% +8.7%
PATEL, PINALBEN V 1 89.2% +9.5%
NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L 1 56.5% +37.2%
LUDWIG, PETER L 1 35.1% +22.7%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19050420 OPERATION-SPECIFIC DEVICE CONFIGURATION CHOUDHURY, ZAHID —
19029670 VIRTUALIZING OBJECTS USING OBJECT MODELS AND OBJECT POSITION DATA PATEL, PINALBEN V —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18332240 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RECORDING TRANSACTION AND PRODUCT CUSTOMIZATION INFORMATION LUDWIG, PETER L 56d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18934965 DEVICE FOR SURFACE COVERING NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L 26d
18332240 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RECORDING TRANSACTION AND PRODUCT CUSTOMIZATION INFORMATION LUDWIG, PETER L 56d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1788 1
3627 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19050420 OPERATION-SPECIFIC DEVICE CONFIGURATION CHOUDHURY, ZAHID — §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 11, 2025
19029670 VIRTUALIZING OBJECTS USING OBJECT MODELS AND OBJECT POSITION DATA PATEL, PINALBEN V — §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18934965 DEVICE FOR SURFACE COVERING NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L 1788 §103Other Non-Final OA 26d Pending Nov 01, 2024
18332240 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RECORDING TRANSACTION AND PRODUCT CUSTOMIZATION INFORMATION LUDWIG, PETER L 3627 §101§103 Final Rejection 56d Pending Jun 09, 2023

Managing Lowe'S Companies Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month