Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Makeblock Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 20 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Makeblock Co. Ltd. has 5 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units, indicating a focused technical scope. The prosecution involves 5 distinct examiners, which means that every pending action is being reviewed by a different person. This ratio of 5 distinct examiners for 5 pending office actions indicates that there is no concentration of work under any single official.

ISKRA, JOSEPH W is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action. Since there are 5 distinct examiners for 5 pending office actions, the workload is perfectly distributed. The concentration in only 2 distinct art units suggests that the company 5 pending actions are technically similar, even though they are being reviewed by 5 different individuals. Managing 5 pending office actions with 5 distinct examiners across 2 art units requires the company to be prepared for a range of individual perspectives. Practitioners should ensure that the prosecution of these 5 actions remains consistent despite the lack of examiner overlap.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
3
Medium (60%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only3 (60%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
2
Business / Other
40% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ISKRA, JOSEPH W 1 71.3% +27.2%
RHUE, ABIGAIL H 1 53.6% +38.7%
CARTER, CHRISTOPHER W 1 74.8% +20.3%
XING, CHRISTINA ILONA 1 82.9% +17.8%
PHAN, MINH Q 1 75.8% -4.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18950927 PROCESSING CONTROL METHOD, PROCESSING DEVICE, AND PROCESSING SYSTEM XING, CHRISTINA ILONA —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18982769 METHOD OF MEASURING MACHINED REGION, NUMERICAL CONTROL MACHINE AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM CARTER, CHRISTOPHER W —
18943034 DISTANCE DETECTOR, PROCESSING HEAD AND PROCESSING DEVICE PHAN, MINH Q —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19353669 AUTOMATIC FOCUSING METHOD, LASER PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM ISKRA, JOSEPH W 15d
19329764 LASER MODULE AND LASER PROCESSING DEVICE RHUE, ABIGAIL H —
18982769 METHOD OF MEASURING MACHINED REGION, NUMERICAL CONTROL MACHINE AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM CARTER, CHRISTOPHER W —
18950927 PROCESSING CONTROL METHOD, PROCESSING DEVICE, AND PROCESSING SYSTEM XING, CHRISTINA ILONA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3761 2
2877 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19353669 AUTOMATIC FOCUSING METHOD, LASER PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM ISKRA, JOSEPH W 3761 §103 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Oct 09, 2025
19329764 LASER MODULE AND LASER PROCESSING DEVICE RHUE, ABIGAIL H 3761 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 16, 2025
18982769 METHOD OF MEASURING MACHINED REGION, NUMERICAL CONTROL MACHINE AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM CARTER, CHRISTOPHER W — §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18950927 PROCESSING CONTROL METHOD, PROCESSING DEVICE, AND PROCESSING SYSTEM XING, CHRISTINA ILONA 2877 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18943034 DISTANCE DETECTOR, PROCESSING HEAD AND PROCESSING DEVICE PHAN, MINH Q — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 11, 2024

Managing Makeblock Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month