Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Meld Manufacturing Corporation

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Meld Manufacturing Corporation is currently navigating 3 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, indicating a spread of technical subject matter even within the primary technology category. This distribution suggests that the company is pursuing diverse innovations that require review from multiple specialized groups at the patent office.

The busiest examiner identified in the data is WU, JENNY R, who is currently handling 1 pending office action. Given that the total number of pending office actions is 3, the workload is distributed among the 3 distinct examiners. This lack of concentration means that no single examiner holds a majority of the company's active cases. Practitioners should prepare for varied feedback across these different art units, as each of the 3 examiners will likely apply different interpretive standards to the Chemistry & Materials filings.

Because there are 3 distinct art units involved, the company must manage its intellectual property across several administrative boundaries. The busiest examiner, WU, JENNY R, is responsible for 1 pending office action, which represents only a portion of the total activity. This requires a flexible prosecution strategy that accounts for the unique requirements of each examiner and art unit involved in the Chemistry & Materials portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WU, JENNY R 1 63.5% +16.0%
STONER, KILEY SHAWN 1 80.8% +15.3%
HAUTH, GALEN H 1 64.8% +18.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18380572 6000 SERIES ALUMINUM ALLOY PRODUCTS PRODUCED USING SOLID STATE MANUFACTURING WU, JENNY R 12d
18482785 SOLID-STATE JOINING OF FEATURES TO CAST PARTS STONER, KILEY SHAWN —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18380572 6000 SERIES ALUMINUM ALLOY PRODUCTS PRODUCED USING SOLID STATE MANUFACTURING WU, JENNY R 12d
18482785 SOLID-STATE JOINING OF FEATURES TO CAST PARTS STONER, KILEY SHAWN —
17395891 ACCESSORY DEVICE FOR A SOLID-STATE ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM ENABLING PRINTING OF LARGE AND COMPLEX PARTS HAUTH, GALEN H —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1733 1
1735 1
1743 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18380572 6000 SERIES ALUMINUM ALLOY PRODUCTS PRODUCED USING SOLID STATE MANUFACTURING WU, JENNY R 1733 §102§103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Oct 16, 2023
18482785 SOLID-STATE JOINING OF FEATURES TO CAST PARTS STONER, KILEY SHAWN 1735 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 06, 2023
17395891 ACCESSORY DEVICE FOR A SOLID-STATE ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM ENABLING PRINTING OF LARGE AND COMPLEX PARTS HAUTH, GALEN H 1743 §102DP Final Rejection — Pending Aug 06, 2021

Managing Meld Manufacturing Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month