Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Micro Focus LLC

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security

25 pending office actions • 16 art units • 25 examiners • 0 of 25 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 55 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Micro Focus LLC maintains a presence in the Networking & Security technology area with 24 pending office actions. This volume of activity is distributed across 24 distinct examiners, which represents a diversified prosecution strategy. By engaging with this many examiners, the company avoids over-reliance on the discretion of any individual at the patent office.

The portfolio's reach extends across 16 distinct art units, indicating a broad technical scope within the Networking & Security field. This distribution across 16 units suggests that the company's innovations touch upon various sub-sectors of the industry, requiring navigation of multiple sets of examination guidelines. The complexity of managing the pending actions across so many different administrative divisions requires significant coordination.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is AGUIAR, JOHNNY B, who is currently handling 1 pending office action. It is notable that even the busiest examiner only manages 1 of the pending actions, reinforcing the observation that the workload is spread out. This lack of concentration means that no examiner's backlog or specific examination style will significantly impact the overall trajectory of the company's pending intellectual property.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

25
Total Pending OAs
11
Non-Final OAs
13
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 11 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
2
Due this week
3
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 11 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 7 days (2)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

11
Hard (44%)
13
Medium (52%)
1
Easy (4%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (8%)
§101 + other6 (24%)
§103 only13 (52%)
Double-patenting only1 (4%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
17
Information Tech
68% of docket
2
Communications
8% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
4% of docket
5
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

250 h
Manual time on pending OAs
50 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
88 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AGUIAR, JOHNNY B 1 80.4% +19.3%
ROCHE, JOHN B 1 74.1% -20.0%
CHEN, SHIN HON 1 86.2% +13.4%
ADESANYA, OLUJIMI A 1 65.8% +26.9%
LIEW, ALEX KOK SOON 1 87.6% +7.2%
CHOWDHURY, ZIAUL A. 1 87.1% +36.4%
MALIK, ZEERICK ASIM 1 — —
SALEHI, HELAI 1 73.0% +32.2%
CHAO, MICHAEL W 1 70.1% +39.7%
MCINTOSH, ANDREW T 1 77.4% +18.2%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18917745 Image-Based Object Identification Scalability Improvement LIEW, ALEX KOK SOON —
18830514 Using a Tested Software Bill-of-Materials (TSBOM) for Installing and Executing a Software Application CHOWDHURY, ZIAUL A. —

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18389770 PATCH GENERATION FOR FLAWS IN SOFTWARE SOUGH, HYUNG SUB 59d overdue
18182241 Application Resource Tracking Between Load Cycles of an Application LIN, KATHERINE Y 7d
18098582 LEARNING BASED IDENTIFICATION OF VULNERABLE FUNCTIONS IN RELATION TO COMMON VULNERABILITIES AND EXPOSURES (CVE) FARAMARZI, GITA 14d
18210649 AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CRYPTOGRAPHIC KEYS LOZA, JANICE JOMARIE 34d
19209463 AUTOMATED NETWORK CONFIGURATION AGUIAR, JOHNNY B —
18969260 SENSITIVE INFORMATION DISCOVERY AND TEST COMPONENT CONFIGURATION CHEN, SHIN HON —
18938543 ENABLING CUSTOM WORD IDENTIFICATION IN SPEECH-TO-TEXT MODELS ADESANYA, OLUJIMI A —
18774916 AUTOMATIC SCRIPT ERROR DETECTION AND CORRECTION MALIK, ZEERICK ASIM —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18757995 THREAD-BASED MALWARE DETECTION CHAO, MICHAEL W 13d
19209463 AUTOMATED NETWORK CONFIGURATION AGUIAR, JOHNNY B —
18969260 SENSITIVE INFORMATION DISCOVERY AND TEST COMPONENT CONFIGURATION CHEN, SHIN HON —
18938543 ENABLING CUSTOM WORD IDENTIFICATION IN SPEECH-TO-TEXT MODELS ADESANYA, OLUJIMI A —
18830514 Using a Tested Software Bill-of-Materials (TSBOM) for Installing and Executing a Software Application CHOWDHURY, ZIAUL A. —
18769377 Using Codes to Provide More Secure Authentication SALEHI, HELAI —
18620798 Real-Time Management of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Input Data/Training Corpus MCINTOSH, ANDREW T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2192 2
2193 2
2433 2
2492 2
2658 1
2674 1
2191 1
2400 1
3698 1
2436 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19209463 AUTOMATED NETWORK CONFIGURATION AGUIAR, JOHNNY B — §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 15, 2025
19201684 IDENTIFYING ANOMALOUS DEVICE CONFIGURATION ROCHE, JOHN B — DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 07, 2025
18969260 SENSITIVE INFORMATION DISCOVERY AND TEST COMPONENT CONFIGURATION CHEN, SHIN HON — §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18938543 ENABLING CUSTOM WORD IDENTIFICATION IN SPEECH-TO-TEXT MODELS ADESANYA, OLUJIMI A 2658 §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 06, 2024
18917745 Image-Based Object Identification Scalability Improvement LIEW, ALEX KOK SOON 2674 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 16, 2024
18830514 Using a Tested Software Bill-of-Materials (TSBOM) for Installing and Executing a Software Application CHOWDHURY, ZIAUL A. 2192 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 10, 2024
18774916 AUTOMATIC SCRIPT ERROR DETECTION AND CORRECTION MALIK, ZEERICK ASIM 2193 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 16, 2024
18769377 Using Codes to Provide More Secure Authentication SALEHI, HELAI 2433 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 10, 2024
18757995 THREAD-BASED MALWARE DETECTION CHAO, MICHAEL W 2492 §103 Final Rejection 13d Pending Jun 28, 2024
18620798 Real-Time Management of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Input Data/Training Corpus MCINTOSH, ANDREW T — §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2024
18604669 License Analysis for Artificial Intelligence (AI) Generated Compositions SESAY, HASSAN RAMADAN — §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 14, 2024
18591719 Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Algorithms to Identify Input that Produces Issues in AI Generated Source Code BOURZIK, BRAHIM 2191 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Feb 29, 2024
18389770 PATCH GENERATION FOR FLAWS IN SOFTWARE SOUGH, HYUNG SUB 2192 §101 Final Rejection 59d overdue Pending Dec 19, 2023
18533713 Scanning of Training Code to Prevent Vulnerabilities in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Generated Source Code LYNCH, SHARON S 2400 §103 Final Rejection 6d Pending Dec 08, 2023
18367453 DISCOVER AND MODEL APPLICATIONS DEPLOYED IN CONTAINERIZED PLATFORMS HU, SELINA ELISA 2193 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 12, 2023
18336364 DETECTION OF MALICIOUS SOFTWARE PACKAGES USING MACHINE LEARNING ON CODE AND COMMUNITY DATA ALMEIDA, DEVIN E 2492 §103 Final Rejection 26d overdue Pending Jun 16, 2023
18210649 AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CRYPTOGRAPHIC KEYS LOZA, JANICE JOMARIE 3698 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Jun 15, 2023
18131041 CLIENT-SIDE COMPOSITION ANALYSIS GELAGAY, SHEWAYE 2436 §103 Final Rejection 45d overdue Pending Apr 05, 2023
18191747 Audit Chain for Encrypted Hashes ABYANEH, ALI S 2437 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Mar 28, 2023
18182241 Application Resource Tracking Between Load Cycles of an Application LIN, KATHERINE Y 2113 §101 Final Rejection 7d Pending Mar 10, 2023
18098582 LEARNING BASED IDENTIFICATION OF VULNERABLE FUNCTIONS IN RELATION TO COMMON VULNERABILITIES AND EXPOSURES (CVE) FARAMARZI, GITA 2496 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 14d Pending Jan 18, 2023
18149623 Multi-Level Virtual Resource Authentication XIE, EDGAR WANGSHU 2433 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 03, 2023
17956664 WATERMARK SERVER EDWARDS, LINGLAN E 2408 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 29, 2022
17623851 SCHEDULING VIRTUAL USERS BASED ON CURVE FITTING RUTNAM, SAMUEL DILAN 2471 §103 Non-Final OA 71d overdue Pending Dec 29, 2021
17176944 BUILDING, TRAINING, AND MAINTAINING AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGNECE-BASED FUNCTIONL TESTING TOOL MACASIANO, JOANNE GONZALES 2197 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 16, 2021

Managing Micro Focus LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month