Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Examiner: CHOWDHURY, ZIAUL A.

Tech Center 2100 • Art Units: 2175 2192

This examiner grants 87% of resolved cases

Analysis

Ziaul A. Chowdhury is an examiner in Tech Center 2100 and Art Unit 2175. The examiner has 558 resolved cases, providing a substantial amount of data for analysis. The allowance rate is 87.1 percent, which is a high figure that suggests a favorable environment for patent grants. This rate indicates that the examiner frequently finds a path to allowance for the applications under review.

The interview lift is a significant 36.4 percent, highlighting the effectiveness of direct communication. Practitioners who engage in interviews are much more likely to see their cases allowed, making this a key strategy for prosecution. However, the median days to allowance is 1132, indicating a somewhat lengthy prosecution cycle. While the chances of success are high, especially with an interview, the process is likely to take a significant amount of time. Practitioners should factor this 1132-day duration into their planning while prioritizing interviews to make the most of the high allowance potential.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

87.1%
Allow Rate
+32.1% vs TC avg
577
Total Applications
+36.4%
Interview Lift
1132
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 558 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

16.4%
§101 Eligibility
20.2%
§102 Novelty
52.7%
§103 Obviousness
6.3%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18571797 A Concept for Generating a Test Specification Final Rejection Intel Corporation
18573987 METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND PRODUCT FOR PROCESSING A COMPONENT Non-Final OA Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.
18618559 VECTOR TEST ZONED INSTRUCTION FOR VALIDITY TESTING Non-Final OA INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
18841089 Interface Mapping Method And Apparatus Non-Final OA Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
18612236 INTELLIGENT CODE INTERCEPTOR FOR GENERATING A NO-CODE AUTOMATION TEST SUITE USING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) Final Rejection Bank of America Corporation
18822521 METHOD FOR PREDICTING THE PERFORMANCE OF A SOFTWARE PROGRAM Non-Final OA CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY
18789144 STATIC ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR DYNAMIC COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE Non-Final OA CrowdStrike, Inc.
18788995 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERPRETING SUPERCLASS BEHAVIOR IN DYNAMIC LANGUAGE COMPUTER CODE Non-Final OA CrowdStrike, Inc.
18830514 Using a Tested Software Bill-of-Materials (TSBOM) for Installing and Executing a Software Application Non-Final OA MICRO FOCUS LLC
18856766 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING SCRIPTS BY CODING STYLES Non-Final OA CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month