Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

MillerKnoll Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 44 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

MillerKnoll Inc. currently manages 4 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This portfolio is distributed across 4 distinct examiners, indicating a distribution of examination across the USPTO. The presence of 4 distinct art units highlights the mechanical and e-commerce classifications relevant to the company's intellectual property.

PHILIP J BONZELL is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, and he is responsible for 1 pending office action. This distribution across the 4 distinct art units and the 4 distinct examiners may require a prosecution strategy tailored to the practices of each individual group. Because the 4 pending office actions are handled by distinct examiners, the company's legal team must manage multiple interactions. The 4 distinct art units involved suggest that the company's innovations span multiple technical areas within the broader mechanical systems category.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
25% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BONZELL, PHILIP J 1 78.5% +12.3%
ACOSTA, ERIC LAZARUS 1 87.0% +8.7%
PATEL, MUKUNDBHAI G 1 74.8% +30.3%
PAN, YONGJIA 1 65.2% +31.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18428913 CHAIR ACOSTA, ERIC LAZARUS —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18484312 DC POWER SYSTEM FOR MODULAR WORKSTATIONS PATEL, MUKUNDBHAI G 15d
18548820 USER INTERFACE FOR HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE TABLES PAN, YONGJIA —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18484312 DC POWER SYSTEM FOR MODULAR WORKSTATIONS PATEL, MUKUNDBHAI G 15d
18864421 SEATING STRUCTURE HAVING A NATURAL MATERIAL INTEGRATED WITH AN ELASTICALLY DEFORMABLE LAYER BONZELL, PHILIP J —
18548820 USER INTERFACE FOR HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE TABLES PAN, YONGJIA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3642 1
3644 1
2835 1
2118 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18864421 SEATING STRUCTURE HAVING A NATURAL MATERIAL INTEGRATED WITH AN ELASTICALLY DEFORMABLE LAYER BONZELL, PHILIP J 3642 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 08, 2024
18428913 CHAIR ACOSTA, ERIC LAZARUS 3644 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 31, 2024
18484312 DC POWER SYSTEM FOR MODULAR WORKSTATIONS PATEL, MUKUNDBHAI G 2835 §102§103 Final Rejection 15d Pending Oct 10, 2023
18548820 USER INTERFACE FOR HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE TABLES PAN, YONGJIA 2118 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 01, 2023

Managing MillerKnoll Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month