Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

MITSUBA Corporation

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 3 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

MITSUBA Corporation currently manages 6 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 6 actions are assigned to 6 distinct examiners across 3 distinct art units. This suggests a concentration of technical focus, as the 6 examiners are grouped into only 3 specialized art units at the USPTO.

Victor L Macarthur is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. Since there are 6 pending actions and 6 distinct examiners, the workload is evenly split across the identified individuals. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that no single examiner is currently managing more than one case for this company.

The use of only 3 distinct art units for 6 pending office actions implies that multiple examiners are working within the same technical classifications. Practitioners should be prepared to manage 6 distinct examiner relationships while navigating the specific policies of the 3 art units involved. This structure may allow for more consistent feedback across the portfolio, as the 6 examiners are concentrated in a small number of technical groups within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MACARTHUR, VICTOR L 1 66.3% +12.8%
ELAHMADI, ZAKARIA 1 76.0% +11.9%
SCHLAK, DANIEL KEITH 1 75.0% +33.3%
RODGERS, THOMAS RAYMOND 1 58.6% +59.2%
MCFARLAND, TYLER JAMES 1 44.9% +37.7%
VO, ETHAN NGUYEN 1 79.0% +10.1%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18416892 WIPING DEVICE MCFARLAND, TYLER JAMES 15d overdue
19166032 MOTOR DEVICE MACARTHUR, VICTOR L —
19079380 MOTOR DEVICE SCHLAK, DANIEL KEITH —
18706729 WIPER BLADE RODGERS, THOMAS RAYMOND —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18416892 WIPING DEVICE MCFARLAND, TYLER JAMES 15d overdue
19203096 WORM ELAHMADI, ZAKARIA 56d
19166032 MOTOR DEVICE MACARTHUR, VICTOR L —
19079380 MOTOR DEVICE SCHLAK, DANIEL KEITH —
18706729 WIPER BLADE RODGERS, THOMAS RAYMOND —
18547881 ROTOR AND MOTOR VO, ETHAN NGUYEN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3618 2
3723 2
2834 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19166032 MOTOR DEVICE MACARTHUR, VICTOR L 3618 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 16, 2025
19203096 WORM ELAHMADI, ZAKARIA 3618 §103 Non-Final OA 56d Pending May 08, 2025
19079380 MOTOR DEVICE SCHLAK, DANIEL KEITH — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 13, 2025
18706729 WIPER BLADE RODGERS, THOMAS RAYMOND 3723 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 01, 2024
18416892 WIPING DEVICE MCFARLAND, TYLER JAMES 3723 §102§103 Final Rejection 15d overdue Pending Jan 19, 2024
18547881 ROTOR AND MOTOR VO, ETHAN NGUYEN 2834 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 25, 2023

Managing MITSUBA Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month