Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026

Moat Metrics Inc. Dba Moat

8 pending office actions • 5 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (88%)
1
Medium (12%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only7 (88%)
§103 only1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
88% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
YONO, RAVEN E 1 39.6% +32.8%
CORRIELUS, JEAN M 1 84.0% +12.8%
POINVIL, FRANTZY 1 79.1% +15.9%
GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER 1 16.0% +33.8%
LAKHANI, ANDREW C 1 22.2% +29.8%
MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J 1 34.8% +54.7%
KWONG, CHO YIU 1 32.1% +4.7%
LEMIEUX, JESSICA 1 65.3% +23.3%

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17475752 MODEL-BASED ANALYSIS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL KWONG, CHO YIU 17d overdue
18421504 Analysis Of Intellectual-Property Data In Relation To Products And Services POINVIL, FRANTZY 4d overdue
18827427 DYNAMIC DATA SET PARSING FOR VALUE MODELING YONO, RAVEN E 1d overdue
17478603 INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY ANALYSIS PLATFORM MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J 14d
18601321 DOCUMENT ANALYSIS USING MODEL INTERSECTIONS CORRIELUS, JEAN M 15d
17832429 Dataset Distinctiveness Modeling LAKHANI, ANDREW C 23d
18142544 INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY LANDSCAPING PLATFORM GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER
17281002 FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS LEMIEUX, JESSICA

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18421504 Analysis Of Intellectual-Property Data In Relation To Products And Services POINVIL, FRANTZY 4d overdue
18827427 DYNAMIC DATA SET PARSING FOR VALUE MODELING YONO, RAVEN E 1d overdue
17478603 INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY ANALYSIS PLATFORM MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J 14d
18601321 DOCUMENT ANALYSIS USING MODEL INTERSECTIONS CORRIELUS, JEAN M 15d
17832429 Dataset Distinctiveness Modeling LAKHANI, ANDREW C 23d
18142544 INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY LANDSCAPING PLATFORM GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER
17281002 FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS LEMIEUX, JESSICA

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3693 2
3600 2
3629 2
3694 1
2159 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18827427 DYNAMIC DATA SET PARSING FOR VALUE MODELING YONO, RAVEN E 3694 §101 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Sep 06, 2024
18601321 DOCUMENT ANALYSIS USING MODEL INTERSECTIONS CORRIELUS, JEAN M 2159 §101 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Mar 11, 2024
18421504 Analysis Of Intellectual-Property Data In Relation To Products And Services POINVIL, FRANTZY 3693 §101 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Jan 24, 2024
18142544 INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY LANDSCAPING PLATFORM GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER 3600 §103 Non-Final OA Pending May 02, 2023
17832429 Dataset Distinctiveness Modeling LAKHANI, ANDREW C 3629 §101 Final Rejection 23d Pending Jun 03, 2022
17478603 INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY ANALYSIS PLATFORM MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J 3629 §101 Final Rejection 14d Pending Sep 17, 2021
17475752 MODEL-BASED ANALYSIS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL KWONG, CHO YIU 3693 §101 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Sep 15, 2021
17281002 FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS LEMIEUX, JESSICA 3600 §101 Final Rejection Pending Mar 29, 2021

Managing Moat Metrics Inc. Dba Moat's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month