Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
9 pending office actions • 6 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Moat Metrics Inc. Dba Moat is navigating 9 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are spread across 6 distinct art units, which suggests the portfolio covers several different sub-sectors or mechanical applications. The company interacts with 9 distinct examiners, meaning every pending action is currently under the review of a unique official. This high number of distinct examiners requires a broad strategy to address 9 different sets of examination tendencies.
Raven E Yono is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 pending office action. Because the number of distinct examiners matches the total number of pending office actions, the workload is perfectly distributed. This lack of examiner overlap across the 6 distinct art units may require a diverse approach to prosecution, as no single examiner's habits will dominate the portfolio. Practitioners should be prepared for a wide range of examiner feedback across the 6 distinct art units, as the decentralized nature of the workload limits the impact of any single examiner's decisions. Managing 9 distinct examiners simultaneously necessitates a highly organized prosecution strategy to ensure consistency across the 9 pending office actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 5 (56%) |
| §101 + other | 4 (44%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| YONO, RAVEN E | 1 | 38.9% | +33.6% |
| PATEL, DIVESH | 1 | 53.2% | +41.2% |
| CORRIELUS, JEAN M | 1 | 84.0% | +12.5% |
| POINVIL, FRANTZY | 1 | 79.0% | +15.3% |
| GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER | 1 | 16.1% | +33.9% |
| LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 1 | 23.0% | +28.7% |
| MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J | 1 | 33.8% | +52.3% |
| KWONG, CHO YIU | 1 | 32.3% | +4.3% |
| LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 1 | 65.2% | +23.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17475752 | MODEL-BASED ANALYSIS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL | KWONG, CHO YIU | 17d overdue |
| 18421504 | Analysis Of Intellectual-Property Data In Relation To Products And Services | POINVIL, FRANTZY | 4d overdue |
| 18827427 | DYNAMIC DATA SET PARSING FOR VALUE MODELING | YONO, RAVEN E | 1d overdue |
| 17478603 | INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY ANALYSIS PLATFORM | MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J | 14d |
| 18601321 | DOCUMENT ANALYSIS USING MODEL INTERSECTIONS | CORRIELUS, JEAN M | 15d |
| 17832429 | Dataset Distinctiveness Modeling | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 23d |
| 18769819 | VENDOR MANAGEMENT PLATFORM | PATEL, DIVESH | 27d |
| 18142544 | INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY LANDSCAPING PLATFORM | GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18421504 | Analysis Of Intellectual-Property Data In Relation To Products And Services | POINVIL, FRANTZY | 4d overdue |
| 18827427 | DYNAMIC DATA SET PARSING FOR VALUE MODELING | YONO, RAVEN E | 1d overdue |
| 17478603 | INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY ANALYSIS PLATFORM | MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J | 14d |
| 18601321 | DOCUMENT ANALYSIS USING MODEL INTERSECTIONS | CORRIELUS, JEAN M | 15d |
| 17832429 | Dataset Distinctiveness Modeling | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 23d |
| 18769819 | VENDOR MANAGEMENT PLATFORM | PATEL, DIVESH | 27d |
| 18142544 | INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY LANDSCAPING PLATFORM | GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER | — |
| 17281002 | FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS | LEMIEUX, JESSICA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3693 | 2 |
| 3600 | 2 |
| 3629 | 2 |
| 3694 | 1 |
| 3696 | 1 |
| 2159 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18827427 | DYNAMIC DATA SET PARSING FOR VALUE MODELING | YONO, RAVEN E | 3694 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 1d overdue | Pending | Sep 06, 2024 |
| 18769819 | VENDOR MANAGEMENT PLATFORM | PATEL, DIVESH | 3696 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Jul 11, 2024 |
| 18601321 | DOCUMENT ANALYSIS USING MODEL INTERSECTIONS | CORRIELUS, JEAN M | 2159 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Mar 11, 2024 |
| 18421504 | Analysis Of Intellectual-Property Data In Relation To Products And Services | POINVIL, FRANTZY | 3693 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Jan 24, 2024 |
| 18142544 | INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY LANDSCAPING PLATFORM | GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER | 3600 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 02, 2023 |
| 17832429 | Dataset Distinctiveness Modeling | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 3629 | §101 | Final Rejection | 23d | Pending | Jun 03, 2022 |
| 17478603 | INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY ANALYSIS PLATFORM | MONAGHAN, MICHAEL J | 3629 | §101 | Final Rejection | 14d | Pending | Sep 17, 2021 |
| 17475752 | MODEL-BASED ANALYSIS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL | KWONG, CHO YIU | 3693 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | 17d overdue | Pending | Sep 15, 2021 |
| 17281002 | FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS | LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 3600 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 29, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial