Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Musashi Seimitsu Industry Co., Ltd.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Musashi Seimitsu Industry Co., Ltd. has 5 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 5 actions are distributed across 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units. This distribution means that every pending action is being handled by a different examiner in a different art unit.

Vishal J Pancholi is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. This indicates a fragmented prosecution landscape where each chemical or material innovation is being evaluated in a unique technical context. For practitioners, the 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units for 5 pending office actions mean that there is no concentration of personnel or technical groups. This 1 to 1 ratio across all 5 actions requires a tailored strategy for every single filing in the portfolio to address the specific requirements of each examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only2 (50%)
§102 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
25% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PANCHOLI, VISHAL J 1 72.8% +25.3%
PENCE, JETHRO M 1 79.0% +25.4%
LEWIS, TISHA D 1 87.6% +9.6%
BRAUNLICH, MARTIN WALTER 1 63.7% +37.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18994784 TRANSMISSION DEVICE LEWIS, TISHA D 79d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18868510 STORAGE BATTERY MANAGEMENT DEVICE AND STORAGE BATTERY MANAGEMENT METHOD BRAUNLICH, MARTIN WALTER —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18012139 LIQUID MATERIAL DISCHARGE DEVICE AND LIQUID MATERIAL APPLICATION DEVICE PENCE, JETHRO M 10d overdue
19137499 DISCHARGE STATE INSPECTION METHOD, DISCHARGE STATE INSPECTION DEVICE, AND DROPLET INSPECTION SYSTEM PANCHOLI, VISHAL J —
18868510 STORAGE BATTERY MANAGEMENT DEVICE AND STORAGE BATTERY MANAGEMENT METHOD BRAUNLICH, MARTIN WALTER —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3754 1
1717 1
3619 1
2858 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19137499 DISCHARGE STATE INSPECTION METHOD, DISCHARGE STATE INSPECTION DEVICE, AND DROPLET INSPECTION SYSTEM PANCHOLI, VISHAL J 3754 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 10, 2025
18012139 LIQUID MATERIAL DISCHARGE DEVICE AND LIQUID MATERIAL APPLICATION DEVICE PENCE, JETHRO M 1717 §102 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Dec 21, 2022
18994784 TRANSMISSION DEVICE LEWIS, TISHA D 3619 §103 Final Rejection 79d overdue Pending Jan 15, 2025
18868510 STORAGE BATTERY MANAGEMENT DEVICE AND STORAGE BATTERY MANAGEMENT METHOD BRAUNLICH, MARTIN WALTER 2858 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 22, 2024

Managing Musashi Seimitsu Industry Co., Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month