Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Muska Co. Ltd. is managing 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This active matter is assigned to a distinct examiner and is located within a distinct art unit. This indicates a very specific and singular focus for the company's current patent prosecution activity. The busiest examiner for the portfolio is GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A, who is currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action.
Because the pending office action is handled by a single official, the company's immediate results in the Chemistry & Materials sector depend on this individual's review. The presence of the distinct art unit suggests that the technology being patented is highly specialized. This concentration simplifies the management of the portfolio, as there are no other active examiners or art units to coordinate with at this time. This streamlined structure allows the company to dedicate its resources to the specific feedback provided by GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A without the need to balance multiple conflicting office actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A | 1 | 36.0% | +34.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18577986 | SLEEP INDUCTION AND SLEEP QUALITY IMPROVEMENT DRINK | GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A | 36d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1759 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18577986 | SLEEP INDUCTION AND SLEEP QUALITY IMPROVEMENT DRINK | GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A | 1759 | §103 | Final Rejection | 36d | Pending | Jan 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial