Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Nanoramic Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nanoramic Inc. has 5 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio is decentralized, with the 5 pending actions spread across 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units. This ratio between actions, examiners, and art units indicates that each pending matter is being reviewed in a unique administrative context. LI, AIQUN is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action.

Because each of the 5 distinct examiners holds exactly 1 pending action, the prosecution workload is balanced across the 5 distinct art units. This distribution suggests a diverse set of technologies within the Chemistry & Materials field. Practitioners should be prepared to manage 5 distinct examiners, as the 5 pending office actions are not concentrated in any single art unit or under any single examiner's review. The requirement to engage with 5 distinct art units implies that the company must adapt to five different sets of examination guidelines simultaneously.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (60%)
§102 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LI, AIQUN 1 63.7% +23.1%
JONES, OLIVIA ANN 1 58.6% +52.3%
GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 1 24.1% +13.4%
KASS-MULLET, BENJAMIN ELI 1 71.4% +6.3%
TALBOT, BRIAN K 1 59.2% +30.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18247849 MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 26d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18247849 MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 26d
18220050 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES JONES, OLIVIA ANN 34d
18481651 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES LI, AIQUN —
17986077 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES TALBOT, BRIAN K —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1766 1
1789 1
1727 1
1752 1
1712 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18481651 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES LI, AIQUN 1766 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 05, 2023
18220050 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES JONES, OLIVIA ANN 1789 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Jul 10, 2023
18247849 MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 1727 §102§103Other Non-Final OA 26d Pending Apr 04, 2023
18062214 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES KASS-MULLET, BENJAMIN ELI 1752 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2022
17986077 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES TALBOT, BRIAN K 1712 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Nov 14, 2022

Managing Nanoramic Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Nanoramic Inc. have?

Nanoramic Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Nanoramic Inc. applications?

Aiqun Li has the most, with 1 of Nanoramic Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Nanoramic Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month