Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Nanoramic Inc.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nanoramic Inc. is currently managing 4 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This workload is distributed across 4 distinct examiners, indicating a variety of perspectives being applied to the company's patent applications. Furthermore, the portfolio involves 4 distinct art units, which suggests that the company's technical reach within Chemistry & Materials is broad enough to trigger reviews from multiple specialized groups at the patent office. This level of diversity requires a multi-faceted prosecution strategy to address different examiner tendencies.

The busiest examiner for the company is LI, AIQUN, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This individual handles 1 of the 4 pending office actions, meaning the workload is spread among 4 distinct examiners. The presence of 4 distinct art units highlights a complex prosecution landscape where no single department dominates the company's current activity. Practitioners must account for varied standards when coordinating responses across the Nanoramic Inc. portfolio, especially given the involvement of LI, AIQUN.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
§102 only2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
80% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LI, AIQUN 1 63.8% +23.1%
JONES, OLIVIA ANN 1 58.6% +52.3%
GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 1 24.1% +13.4%
FERGUSON, DION 1 87.0% +8.2%
KASS-MULLET, BENJAMIN ELI 1 70.4% +8.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18029199 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES FERGUSON, DION 112d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18247849 MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 26d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18247849 MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 26d
18220050 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES JONES, OLIVIA ANN 34d
18481651 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES LI, AIQUN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1766 1
1789 1
1727 1
2847 1
1752 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18481651 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES LI, AIQUN 1766 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 05, 2023
18220050 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES JONES, OLIVIA ANN 1789 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Jul 10, 2023
18247849 MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 1727 §102§103Other Non-Final OA 26d Pending Apr 04, 2023
18029199 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES FERGUSON, DION 2847 §102Other Non-Final OA 112d overdue Pending Mar 29, 2023
18062214 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES KASS-MULLET, BENJAMIN ELI 1752 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2022

Managing Nanoramic Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month