Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026

Nanoramic Inc.

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only2 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
25% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LI, AIQUN 1 64.0% +22.4%
FERGUSON, DION 1 86.9% +8.3%
SONG, KEVIN 1 71.1% +17.6%
TALBOT, BRIAN K 1 59.1% +31.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18029199 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES FERGUSON, DION 112d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17927034 SI-CONTAINING COMPOSITE ANODE FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES SONG, KEVIN

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18481651 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES LI, AIQUN
17927034 SI-CONTAINING COMPOSITE ANODE FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES SONG, KEVIN
17986077 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES TALBOT, BRIAN K

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1766 1
2847 1
1728 1
1712 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18481651 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES LI, AIQUN 1766 §102 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 05, 2023
18029199 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES FERGUSON, DION 2847 §102Other Non-Final OA 112d overdue Pending Mar 29, 2023
17927034 SI-CONTAINING COMPOSITE ANODE FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES SONG, KEVIN 1728 §102§103 Final Rejection Pending Nov 22, 2022
17986077 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES TALBOT, BRIAN K 1712 §103DP Non-Final OA Pending Nov 14, 2022

Managing Nanoramic Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month