Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Nimble Robotics, Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nimble Robotics, Inc. is prosecuting matters in the Transportation, E-Commerce and Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio contains 3 pending office actions distributed across 3 distinct examiners. This one-to-one ratio of actions to examiners suggests that the company is engaging with different perspectives at the USPTO simultaneously. The distribution across 3 distinct examiners means that the prosecution is handled by different individuals.

Prosecution is currently spread across 2 distinct art units, indicating technical breadth within the mechanical systems field. The busiest examiner, DIAZ, THOMAS C, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since no single examiner holds a majority of the workload, the portfolio's progress is not dependent on the tendencies of any one individual. This distribution across multiple examiners and art units requires a coordinated approach to maintain consistency in claim scope and arguments across the 3 pending office actions. The presence of 2 distinct art units further suggests that the technology may bridge different classification categories within the USPTO.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (75%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DIAZ, THOMAS C 1 68.5% +19.0%
CUMBESS, YOLANDA RENEE 1 86.9% +8.5%
MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 1 83.6% +12.4%
HUEBNER, ERICA MICHELLE 1 31.7% +35.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18222722 Storage Systems and Methods for Robotic Picking CUMBESS, YOLANDA RENEE 36d overdue

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18039550 MOBILE ROBOT AND ROBOTIC FARMING SYSTEM HUEBNER, ERICA MICHELLE 35d overdue
18206234 Robot Having Interchangeable Batteries MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 8d overdue
18853857 PILLAR FOR GRID-BASED STORAGE SYSTEM HAVING CONSTRAINING FEATURES DIAZ, THOMAS C —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18039550 MOBILE ROBOT AND ROBOTIC FARMING SYSTEM HUEBNER, ERICA MICHELLE 35d overdue
18206234 Robot Having Interchangeable Batteries MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 8d overdue
18853857 PILLAR FOR GRID-BASED STORAGE SYSTEM HAVING CONSTRAINING FEATURES DIAZ, THOMAS C —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3655 1
3653 1
3647 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18853857 PILLAR FOR GRID-BASED STORAGE SYSTEM HAVING CONSTRAINING FEATURES DIAZ, THOMAS C — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 03, 2024
18222722 Storage Systems and Methods for Robotic Picking CUMBESS, YOLANDA RENEE 3655 §103 Final Rejection 36d overdue Pending Jul 17, 2023
18206234 Robot Having Interchangeable Batteries MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 3653 §102§103 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Jun 06, 2023
18039550 MOBILE ROBOT AND ROBOTIC FARMING SYSTEM HUEBNER, ERICA MICHELLE 3647 §102§103 Final Rejection 35d overdue Pending May 31, 2023

Managing Nimble Robotics, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month