Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd.

Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 21 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd. currently manages 5 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This portfolio is distributed across 4 distinct art units, indicating the technical diversity in their ongoing patent applications. The presence of 5 distinct examiners suggests that the company must navigate a variety of individual examination styles rather than a concentrated group.

Among these professionals, SIPES, JOHN CURTIS is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, though he only handles 1 pending office action. This distribution shows that no single examiner currently dominates the prosecution pipeline. Practitioners should prepare for a range of examiner feedback across the 4 distinct art units involved in these 5 pending office actions. The relationship of examiners to pending actions highlights the decentralized nature of the current workload for these 5 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
2
Communications
40% of docket
3
Semiconductors
60% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SIPES, JOHN CURTIS 1 78.0% +19.1%
CASILLASHERNANDEZ, OMAR 1 76.8% +17.4%
DEMETER, HILINA K 1 72.1% +18.8%
NGUYEN, LAUREN 1 54.8% +34.3%
JORDAN, DANIEL JEFFERY 1 56.5% -18.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18563661 HEAD-UP DISPLAY AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING HEAD-UP DISPLAY NGUYEN, LAUREN 4d overdue
19065393 VEHICLE PROJECTION DISPLAY DEVICE SIPES, JOHN CURTIS —
17783403 DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE AND HEAD-UP DISPLAY DEVICE JORDAN, DANIEL JEFFERY —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18563661 HEAD-UP DISPLAY AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING HEAD-UP DISPLAY NGUYEN, LAUREN 4d overdue
19065393 VEHICLE PROJECTION DISPLAY DEVICE SIPES, JOHN CURTIS —
18867587 DISPLAY DEVICE CASILLASHERNANDEZ, OMAR —
18847904 DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE, HEAD-UP DISPLAY DEVICE, AND DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD DEMETER, HILINA K —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2872 2
2689 1
2617 1
2871 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19065393 VEHICLE PROJECTION DISPLAY DEVICE SIPES, JOHN CURTIS 2872 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2025
18867587 DISPLAY DEVICE CASILLASHERNANDEZ, OMAR 2689 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 20, 2024
18847904 DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE, HEAD-UP DISPLAY DEVICE, AND DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD DEMETER, HILINA K 2617 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 17, 2024
18563661 HEAD-UP DISPLAY AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING HEAD-UP DISPLAY NGUYEN, LAUREN 2871 §102§103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Nov 22, 2023
17783403 DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE AND HEAD-UP DISPLAY DEVICE JORDAN, DANIEL JEFFERY 2872 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 08, 2022

Managing Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd. have?

Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd. applications?

John Curtis Sipes has the most, with 1 of Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month