Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Opsys Tech Ltd.

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Opsys Tech Ltd. has 4 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 4 actions are assigned to 4 distinct examiners. This distribution shows that each pending matter is being reviewed by a unique individual. The 4 pending actions are located within 2 distinct art units, which indicates that the company's applications are concentrated in specific technical areas within the broader transportation and mechanical sector.

The busiest examiner is KNOX, KALERIA, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because there are 4 distinct examiners for 4 pending actions, the workload is evenly distributed among the assigned staff. The presence of only 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's current filings are being evaluated by a limited number of supervisory groups. This profile requires managing 4 different examiner relationships while navigating the technical standards of 2 specific administrative units at the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (75%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KNOX, KALERIA 1 68.3% +25.0%
MALIKASIM, JONATHAN L 1 80.5% +0.0%
WERNER, DAVID N 1 68.4% +16.1%
NOEL, JEMPSON 1 66.9% +30.4%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17687652 LiDAR System with Active Fault Monitoring NOEL, JEMPSON 43d overdue
18764268 Adaptive Multiple-Pulse LIDAR System KNOX, KALERIA —
18619069 Extrinsic LiDAR Calibration MALIKASIM, JONATHAN L —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18167847 System and Method for Solid-State LiDAR with Adaptive Blooming Correction WERNER, DAVID N 46d overdue
17687652 LiDAR System with Active Fault Monitoring NOEL, JEMPSON 43d overdue
18764268 Adaptive Multiple-Pulse LIDAR System KNOX, KALERIA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3645 3
2487 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18764268 Adaptive Multiple-Pulse LIDAR System KNOX, KALERIA 3645 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 04, 2024
18619069 Extrinsic LiDAR Calibration MALIKASIM, JONATHAN L 3645 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2024
18167847 System and Method for Solid-State LiDAR with Adaptive Blooming Correction WERNER, DAVID N 2487 §103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Feb 11, 2023
17687652 LiDAR System with Active Fault Monitoring NOEL, JEMPSON 3645 §103§112 Non-Final OA 43d overdue Pending Mar 06, 2022

Managing Opsys Tech Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Opsys Tech Ltd. have?

Opsys Tech Ltd. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Opsys Tech Ltd. applications?

Kaleria Knox has the most, with 1 of Opsys Tech Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Opsys Tech Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month