Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Optilab LLC

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Optilab LLC currently has 2 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, showing a diversified examination process even with a small number of pending matters. WONG, ERIC K is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, and he is responsible for 1 pending office action. This distribution across 2 distinct art units indicates that the company's innovations are being evaluated under different technical classifications.

This variety in examiners and art units may lead to different prosecution timelines for each application. Because the 2 pending office actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners, the company must manage two separate examiner relationships and styles. The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the technical subject matter of the filings is distinct enough to be classified separately within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field. WONG, ERIC K handles 1 pending office action, representing half of the company's current active matters.

Practitioners should be aware that the lack of concentration in examiners and art units requires a tailored approach for each of the 2 pending office actions, as there is no unified examination path for the company's current semiconductor and optics filings. This decentralized structure requires a coordinated effort to ensure consistency across the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics filings. The involvement of multiple examiners and art units means the company must navigate varied examination styles for its current pending matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SMITH, MAURICE C 1 84.5% -4.0%
WONG, ERIC K 1 83.8% +7.6%
REVERMAN, CHAD ANDREW 1 57.5% +41.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18749225 NON-INTERFEROMETRIC THIN FILM LITHIUM NIOBATE MODULATOR FOR DATA TRANSMISSION WONG, ERIC K 15d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19454004 THIN-FILM LITHIUM-NIOBATE (TFLN)-BASED MODULATOR FOR FIBER OPTIC GYROSCOPES AND OTHER APPLICATIONS SMITH, MAURICE C —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18741501 OPTICALLY ISOLATED LIGHTWAVE CURRENT SENSOR REVERMAN, CHAD ANDREW 5d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2877 2
2874 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19454004 THIN-FILM LITHIUM-NIOBATE (TFLN)-BASED MODULATOR FOR FIBER OPTIC GYROSCOPES AND OTHER APPLICATIONS SMITH, MAURICE C 2877 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 20, 2026
18749225 NON-INTERFEROMETRIC THIN FILM LITHIUM NIOBATE MODULATOR FOR DATA TRANSMISSION WONG, ERIC K 2874 §103 Non-Final OA 15d overdue Pending Jun 20, 2024
18741501 OPTICALLY ISOLATED LIGHTWAVE CURRENT SENSOR REVERMAN, CHAD ANDREW 2877 §103 Final Rejection 5d overdue Pending Jun 12, 2024

Managing Optilab LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month