Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Paccar Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 54 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Paccar Inc. currently has 4 pending office actions. These 4 pending office actions are categorized within the Communications technology area. The prosecution involves 4 distinct examiners. This distribution across 4 distinct examiners indicates that each pending case is handled by a different individual.

The work is organized into 4 distinct art units. These 4 distinct art units are part of the Communications sector. TUN, NAY L is the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. The 1 pending office action is one of the cases currently under review at the patent office.

The 4 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units provide the technical review for the portfolio. Practitioners should monitor the 4 pending office actions for consistent prosecution results across the different examiners. The Communications technology area remains the focus for these filings. TUN, NAY L and the other examiners handle the ongoing prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
20% of docket
3
Communications
60% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TUN, NAY L 1 65.0% +31.3%
NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN 1 62.5% +16.7%
YANG, JAMES J 1 57.0% +22.3%
SOTO LOPEZ, JOSE R 1 69.1% +3.8%
MITCHELL, JASON D 1 55.7% +31.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19286998 THEFT PREVENTION SYSTEM AND METHOD TUN, NAY L —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18304131 BATTERY PACK SAFETY MONITOR NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN 27d
19286998 THEFT PREVENTION SYSTEM AND METHOD TUN, NAY L —
18170176 TRAILER CONNECTION SAFETY SYSTEM YANG, JAMES J —
17946525 ERROR-RESILIENT OVER-THE-AIR SOFTWARE UPDATES FOR VEHICLES MITCHELL, JASON D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2688 1
2858 1
2686 1
2622 1
2199 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19286998 THEFT PREVENTION SYSTEM AND METHOD TUN, NAY L 2688 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2025
18304131 BATTERY PACK SAFETY MONITOR NAVARRO, HUGO IVAN 2858 §103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Apr 20, 2023
18170176 TRAILER CONNECTION SAFETY SYSTEM YANG, JAMES J 2686 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 16, 2023
18164804 DUAL VIEW VEHICLE DISPLAY SOTO LOPEZ, JOSE R 2622 §103 Non-Final OA 84d Pending Feb 06, 2023
17946525 ERROR-RESILIENT OVER-THE-AIR SOFTWARE UPDATES FOR VEHICLES MITCHELL, JASON D 2199 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 16, 2022

Managing Paccar Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Paccar Inc. have?

Paccar Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Paccar Inc. applications?

Nay L Tun has the most, with 1 of Paccar Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Paccar Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month