Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026

Pegasus Solar Inc.

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TRIGGS, ANDREW J 2 66.8% +27.6%
MERSHON, JAYNE L 1 66.4% +18.8%
BYRD, EUGENE G 1 69.8% +9.7%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18076734 RAIL SPLICE WITH INTERFERENCE FEATURES TRIGGS, ANDREW J 17d overdue
18972650 SKIP RAIL SYSTEM TRIGGS, ANDREW J 14d
18963081 VARIABLE ANGLE SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SOLAR ENERGY MODULES MERSHON, JAYNE L 39d
18649950 FASTENER SEALANT CAPSULE BYRD, EUGENE G

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18076734 RAIL SPLICE WITH INTERFERENCE FEATURES TRIGGS, ANDREW J 17d overdue
18972650 SKIP RAIL SYSTEM TRIGGS, ANDREW J 14d
18963081 VARIABLE ANGLE SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SOLAR ENERGY MODULES MERSHON, JAYNE L 39d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3635 2
1721 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18972650 SKIP RAIL SYSTEM TRIGGS, ANDREW J 3635 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 14d Pending Dec 06, 2024
18963081 VARIABLE ANGLE SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SOLAR ENERGY MODULES MERSHON, JAYNE L 1721 §102§103 Final Rejection 39d Pending Nov 27, 2024
18649950 FASTENER SEALANT CAPSULE BYRD, EUGENE G §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 29, 2024
18076734 RAIL SPLICE WITH INTERFERENCE FEATURES TRIGGS, ANDREW J 3635 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Dec 07, 2022

Managing Pegasus Solar Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month