Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Phenomune LLC currently manages 3 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This prosecution activity is distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a varied examination environment. AIRAPETIAN, MILA is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 1 pending action.
The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the portfolio covers different technical subjects within the biotechnology field. For the applicant, this distribution requires a flexible prosecution strategy that can adapt to the specific standards of multiple USPTO groups. Because each examiner is currently handling a single matter, the company can pursue independent arguments for each application without immediate concern for examiner-specific overlap.
Managing these pending actions across different examiners allows for a broader range of feedback from the USPTO. This can be beneficial for identifying which claim sets or technical descriptions are most successful in the current examination climate. The focus remains on navigating the requirements of the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector while addressing the specific concerns of the assigned examiners.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIRAPETIAN, MILA | 1 | 72.9% | +14.1% |
| CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N | 1 | 54.5% | +34.4% |
| BENAVIDES, JENNIFER ANN | 1 | 51.2% | +47.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18513534 | COMPOSITIONS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF T2R AND/OR T1R PHENOTYPE IN INDIVIDUALS TO PREDICT WINE TASTING PREFERENCES, CHARACTERIZATION OF WINE IN RELATION TO INDIVIDUAL TASTING PREFERENCES, AND SELECTION OF WINE | AIRAPETIAN, MILA | — |
| 18454598 | COMPOSITIONS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF T2R AND/OR T1R PHENOTYPE IN INDIVIDUALS TO PREDICT CANNABIS TASTING PREFERENCES, CHARACTERIZATION OF CANNABIS IN RELATION TO INDIVIDUAL TASTING PREFERENCES, AND SELECTION OF CANNABIS | CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N | — |
| 17693928 | TESTING METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF T2R PHENOTYPE AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF | BENAVIDES, JENNIFER ANN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18513534 | COMPOSITIONS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF T2R AND/OR T1R PHENOTYPE IN INDIVIDUALS TO PREDICT WINE TASTING PREFERENCES, CHARACTERIZATION OF WINE IN RELATION TO INDIVIDUAL TASTING PREFERENCES, AND SELECTION OF WINE | AIRAPETIAN, MILA | — |
| 18454598 | COMPOSITIONS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF T2R AND/OR T1R PHENOTYPE IN INDIVIDUALS TO PREDICT CANNABIS TASTING PREFERENCES, CHARACTERIZATION OF CANNABIS IN RELATION TO INDIVIDUAL TASTING PREFERENCES, AND SELECTION OF CANNABIS | CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N | — |
| 17693928 | TESTING METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF T2R PHENOTYPE AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF | BENAVIDES, JENNIFER ANN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1675 | 2 |
| 3688 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18513534 | COMPOSITIONS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF T2R AND/OR T1R PHENOTYPE IN INDIVIDUALS TO PREDICT WINE TASTING PREFERENCES, CHARACTERIZATION OF WINE IN RELATION TO INDIVIDUAL TASTING PREFERENCES, AND SELECTION OF WINE | AIRAPETIAN, MILA | 3688 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 18, 2023 |
| 18454598 | COMPOSITIONS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF T2R AND/OR T1R PHENOTYPE IN INDIVIDUALS TO PREDICT CANNABIS TASTING PREFERENCES, CHARACTERIZATION OF CANNABIS IN RELATION TO INDIVIDUAL TASTING PREFERENCES, AND SELECTION OF CANNABIS | CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N | 1675 | §101§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 23, 2023 |
| 17693928 | TESTING METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF T2R PHENOTYPE AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF | BENAVIDES, JENNIFER ANN | 1675 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 14, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial