Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days
Poro Technologies Ltd. is active in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area, where it currently faces 1 pending office action. This figure represents the entirety of the company's current outstanding examination requirements. Such a limited number of pending actions often points to a highly specific or early-stage prosecution phase for the portfolio's current assets, suggesting a focused approach to intellectual property development within the semiconductor sector.
The prosecution landscape is characterized by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a very narrow administrative focus. YEMELYANOV, DMITRIY is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action currently under their review. Because this examiner is the sole individual managing the company's pending actions, their individual examination patterns are of paramount importance to the company's legal strategy. The limitation to 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technical subject matter is confined to a specific regulatory group. This structure simplifies the prosecution strategy by requiring the company to interface with only one technical division and one specific examiner, which can reduce the complexity of managing multiple patent office interactions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHAH, SUJIT | 1 | 66.5% | +11.2% |
| YEMELYANOV, DMITRIY | 1 | 74.3% | +19.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18044811 | LED DEVICE | YEMELYANOV, DMITRIY | 42d |
| 18292691 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING AN LED DISPLAY DEVICE | SHAH, SUJIT | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18044811 | LED DEVICE | YEMELYANOV, DMITRIY | 42d |
| 18292691 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING AN LED DISPLAY DEVICE | SHAH, SUJIT | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2624 | 1 |
| 2891 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18292691 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING AN LED DISPLAY DEVICE | SHAH, SUJIT | 2624 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 26, 2024 |
| 18044811 | LED DEVICE | YEMELYANOV, DMITRIY | 2891 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 42d | Pending | Mar 10, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial