Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Precision AI Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a focused prosecution strategy for the company's current software-related filings. For a practitioner, this concentration means that the outcome of the entire pending portfolio rests on a single examiner's interpretation of the prior art and patentability requirements in the computing field.
PAN, YONGJIA is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit suggests that the computing and software technology is being evaluated by a single specialized group. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of this individual, as there are no other examiners currently providing feedback on the company's applications. This centralized review process simplifies administrative tracking but increases the strategic importance of every interaction with the assigned examiner, particularly regarding software eligibility.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAN, YONGJIA | 1 | 65.2% | +31.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18467124 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTABLE TARGETING IN FIELD TREATMENT | PAN, YONGJIA | 92d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18467124 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTABLE TARGETING IN FIELD TREATMENT | PAN, YONGJIA | 92d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2118 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18467124 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTABLE TARGETING IN FIELD TREATMENT | PAN, YONGJIA | 2118 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 92d overdue | Pending | Sep 14, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial