Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Q Ant GmbH currently has 2 pending office actions. This prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners and 0 distinct art units. AMARA, MOHAMED K is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. With 2 distinct examiners for 2 pending office actions, the company's workload is split evenly, requiring a unique approach for each individual examiner. Practitioners should note that the busiest examiner, AMARA, MOHAMED K, is responsible for 1 of the 2 total pending actions. The presence of 0 distinct art units suggests a focused technological area, yet the involvement of 2 distinct examiners means the applicant must still manage two different sets of examiner preferences.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMARA, MOHAMED K | 1 | 75.8% | +29.8% |
| HOLLINGTON, JERMELE M | 1 | 86.3% | -15.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18963591 | MAGNETIC FIELD GRADIOMETER | HOLLINGTON, JERMELE M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19078319 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING A PARTICLE | AMARA, MOHAMED K | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19078319 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZING A PARTICLE | AMARA, MOHAMED K | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 13, 2025 |
| 18963591 | MAGNETIC FIELD GRADIOMETER | HOLLINGTON, JERMELE M | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial