Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
6 pending office actions • 6 art units • 6 examiners • 5 of 6 (83%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 5 (83%) |
| §102 only | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HE, WEIMING | 1 | 46.1% | +13.0% |
| SNIEZEK, ANDREW L | 1 | 84.9% | +8.9% |
| MITCHELL, JASON D | 1 | 55.0% | +31.8% |
| KY, KEVIN | 1 | 76.6% | +25.6% |
| SOMERS, MARC S | 1 | 64.7% | +34.5% |
| DWIVEDI, MAHESH H | 1 | 69.4% | +4.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18659919 | MICROPHONE HAVING A DIGITAL OUTPUT DETERMINED AT DIFFERENT POWER CONSUMPTION LEVELS | SNIEZEK, ANDREW L | 8d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18538895 | ITERATIVE POLICY-GUIDED PROGRAM SYNTHESIS | MITCHELL, JASON D | 42d overdue |
| 17914297 | FEDERATED MIXTURE MODELS | SOMERS, MARC S | 15d |
| 18501167 | SELF-SUPERVISED POINT CLOUD ORDERING USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | KY, KEVIN | 23d |
| 18744541 | LEARNABLE DEFORMATION FOR POINT CLOUD SELF-SUPERVISED LEARNING | HE, WEIMING | 70d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2611 | 1 |
| 2693 | 1 |
| 2199 | 1 |
| 2671 | 1 |
| 2159 | 1 |
| 2168 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18744541 | LEARNABLE DEFORMATION FOR POINT CLOUD SELF-SUPERVISED LEARNING | HE, WEIMING | 2611 | §103 | Final Rejection | 70d | AI Ready | Jun 14, 2024 |
| 18659919 | MICROPHONE HAVING A DIGITAL OUTPUT DETERMINED AT DIFFERENT POWER CONSUMPTION LEVELS | SNIEZEK, ANDREW L | 2693 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 8d overdue | AI Ready | May 09, 2024 |
| 18538895 | ITERATIVE POLICY-GUIDED PROGRAM SYNTHESIS | MITCHELL, JASON D | 2199 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 42d overdue | AI Ready | Dec 13, 2023 |
| 18501167 | SELF-SUPERVISED POINT CLOUD ORDERING USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | KY, KEVIN | 2671 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 23d | AI Ready | Nov 03, 2023 |
| 17914297 | FEDERATED MIXTURE MODELS | SOMERS, MARC S | 2159 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 15d | AI Ready | Sep 23, 2022 |
| 17756957 | FEDERATED MIXTURE MODELS | DWIVEDI, MAHESH H | 2168 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 57d | Pending | Jun 06, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial