Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Radiaction Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners but are both located within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the company's current filings are technically similar enough to be handled by the same specialized unit. The presence of 1 distinct art unit for all pending matters provides a centralized environment for the company's semiconductor and optics prosecution strategy. This allows for a more coordinated response strategy within the sector, leveraging the standards of the single art unit.
IPPOLITO, NICOLE MARIE is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action. This is a portion of the 2 pending office actions for the portfolio. Because there are 2 distinct examiners involved, the company must address different sets of examiner feedback. However, since both examiners are in the 1 distinct art unit, the underlying examination policies and prior art references cited are likely to be similar across both cases. This structure allows the applicant to gain insights from different reviewers while benefiting from the specialized knowledge of the single technical unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPPOLITO, NICOLE MARIE | 1 | 86.6% | +9.6% |
| KEFAYATI, SOORENA | 1 | 83.6% | +7.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18893562 | RADIATION PROTECTION APPARATUS AND MATERIALS THEREFOR | IPPOLITO, NICOLE MARIE | — |
| 18355680 | SUPPLEMENTARY COLLISION DETECTION AND PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR A MEDICAL IMAGER | KEFAYATI, SOORENA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2884 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18893562 | RADIATION PROTECTION APPARATUS AND MATERIALS THEREFOR | IPPOLITO, NICOLE MARIE | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 23, 2024 |
| 18355680 | SUPPLEMENTARY COLLISION DETECTION AND PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR A MEDICAL IMAGER | KEFAYATI, SOORENA | 2884 | §103Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 20, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial