Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 0 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
Raytron Technology Co. Ltd. currently manages 3 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, providing a variety of individual perspectives on the company's filings. The data indicates 0 distinct art units for these pending matters, which may suggest a specific classification or status for the current filings that has not yet been reflected in the art unit records.
GROSS, ALEXANDER P is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. This represents a portion of the total 3 pending actions for the portfolio. With 3 examiners and 3 pending actions, each examiner is responsible for exactly 1 matter. This distribution means the company must manage 3 separate prosecution tracks simultaneously, even though they are not currently categorized under multiple distinct art units. Practitioners should be prepared to address 3 different sets of examiner feedback and procedural requirements. This decentralized approach requires careful coordination to ensure that the prosecution of each individual matter aligns with the company's overall intellectual property strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GROSS, ALEXANDER P | 1 | 59.1% | +20.9% |
| YUN, JURIE | 1 | 87.4% | +10.2% |
| BILLAH, MASUM | 1 | 80.5% | +20.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18894024 | MULTI-MODE HANDHELD OPTICAL DEVICE | BILLAH, MASUM | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18900858 | FRONT SIGHTING DEVICE AND COMBINED SIGHTING SYSTEM | YUN, JURIE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18921056 | INFRARED THERMAL IMAGING DEVICE AND BUILT-IN RANGE-FINDING INFRARED CAMERA LENS THEREOF | GROSS, ALEXANDER P | — |
| 18900858 | FRONT SIGHTING DEVICE AND COMBINED SIGHTING SYSTEM | YUN, JURIE | — |
| 18894024 | MULTI-MODE HANDHELD OPTICAL DEVICE | BILLAH, MASUM | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18921056 | INFRARED THERMAL IMAGING DEVICE AND BUILT-IN RANGE-FINDING INFRARED CAMERA LENS THEREOF | GROSS, ALEXANDER P | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 21, 2024 |
| 18900858 | FRONT SIGHTING DEVICE AND COMBINED SIGHTING SYSTEM | YUN, JURIE | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 29, 2024 |
| 18894024 | MULTI-MODE HANDHELD OPTICAL DEVICE | BILLAH, MASUM | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial