Technology areas: Computing & Software • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Reon Technology Inc. manages a portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area with 4 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners across 3 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that each pending matter is likely being evaluated under different technical guidelines, as the number of art units matches the number of examiners. Practitioners must adapt to the specific nuances of the separate art units to resolve the 4 pending office actions.
SIDDIQUEE, TAMEEM is the busiest examiner, responsible for 2 pending office actions. This examiner handles a portion of the 4 pending actions, making their individual prosecution style particularly significant for the company's current goals. The remaining actions are split between the other 3 distinct examiners. Because the pending office actions are spread across the separate art units, the portfolio faces a diverse set of examination hurdles despite its relatively small size.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIDDIQUEE, TAMEEM | 2 | 61.9% | +37.6% |
| LAU, TUNG S | 1 | 83.0% | +14.5% |
| MISIURA, BRIAN THOMAS | 1 | 85.4% | +1.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18137471 | BATTERY PERFORMANCE TRACKING ACROSS BATTERY CELLS | LAU, TUNG S | 17d overdue |
| 18115811 | SOFTWARE-DEFINED ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM INTERFACE | MISIURA, BRIAN THOMAS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18385439 | BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH CONTROLLED REPLACEMENT | SIDDIQUEE, TAMEEM | 52d overdue |
| 18137471 | BATTERY PERFORMANCE TRACKING ACROSS BATTERY CELLS | LAU, TUNG S | 17d overdue |
| 18814501 | DISTRIBUTED POWER SYSTEM FOR MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL | SIDDIQUEE, TAMEEM | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2116 | 1 |
| 2857 | 1 |
| 2175 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18814501 | DISTRIBUTED POWER SYSTEM FOR MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL | SIDDIQUEE, TAMEEM | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 24, 2024 |
| 18385439 | BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH CONTROLLED REPLACEMENT | SIDDIQUEE, TAMEEM | 2116 | §103 | Final Rejection | 52d overdue | Pending | Oct 31, 2023 |
| 18137471 | BATTERY PERFORMANCE TRACKING ACROSS BATTERY CELLS | LAU, TUNG S | 2857 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 17d overdue | Pending | Apr 21, 2023 |
| 18115811 | SOFTWARE-DEFINED ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM INTERFACE | MISIURA, BRIAN THOMAS | 2175 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial