Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Resonac Packaging Corporation is managing 6 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 6 actions are distributed among 6 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is currently reviewing 1 matter. This distribution across 6 distinct examiners requires the company to address the specific feedback of 6 different individuals.
The portfolio is active in 4 distinct art units, showing that the company's Chemistry & Materials innovations span multiple technical classifications. Jacob Buchanan is the busiest examiner, overseeing 1 pending office action. Because the 6 pending office actions are spread across 4 distinct art units, the company must coordinate its prosecution strategy across several different divisions of the patent office. Each of the 6 distinct examiners holds 1 pending office action, creating a decentralized prosecution environment for the company's 6 pending matters. This structure requires the applicant to maintain consistent arguments across 4 distinct art units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUCHANAN, JACOB | 1 | 56.1% | +44.9% |
| MCCONNELL, WYATT P | 1 | 80.6% | +9.4% |
| NEDIALKOVA, LILIA V | 1 | 55.3% | +22.2% |
| MANGOHIG, THOMAS A | 1 | 20.0% | +24.4% |
| LI, AIQUN | 1 | 63.8% | +23.1% |
| HEMINGWAY, TIMOTHY G | 1 | 42.7% | +19.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18135655 | BATTERY PACKAGING MATERIAL | MANGOHIG, THOMAS A | 9d overdue |
| 17974464 | BATTERY PACKAGING MATERIAL | HEMINGWAY, TIMOTHY G | 27d |
| 18443284 | PACKAGING MATERIAL FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERIES AND ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY | BUCHANAN, JACOB | — |
| 18437256 | PACKAGING MATERIAL FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERIES AND ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY | MCCONNELL, WYATT P | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18137361 | PACKAGING MATERIAL FOR POWER STORAGE DEVICE, PACKAGING CASE FOR POWER STORAGE DEVICE, AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE | NEDIALKOVA, LILIA V | 104d overdue |
| 18109832 | BATTERY PACKAGING MATERIAL | LI, AIQUN | 52d overdue |
| 18135655 | BATTERY PACKAGING MATERIAL | MANGOHIG, THOMAS A | 9d overdue |
| 17974464 | BATTERY PACKAGING MATERIAL | HEMINGWAY, TIMOTHY G | 27d |
| 18443284 | PACKAGING MATERIAL FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERIES AND ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY | BUCHANAN, JACOB | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1724 | 1 |
| 1788 | 1 |
| 1766 | 1 |
| 1754 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18443284 | PACKAGING MATERIAL FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERIES AND ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY | BUCHANAN, JACOB | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 15, 2024 |
| 18437256 | PACKAGING MATERIAL FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERIES AND ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY | MCCONNELL, WYATT P | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 09, 2024 |
| 18137361 | PACKAGING MATERIAL FOR POWER STORAGE DEVICE, PACKAGING CASE FOR POWER STORAGE DEVICE, AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE | NEDIALKOVA, LILIA V | 1724 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 104d overdue | Pending | Apr 20, 2023 |
| 18135655 | BATTERY PACKAGING MATERIAL | MANGOHIG, THOMAS A | 1788 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d overdue | Pending | Apr 17, 2023 |
| 18109832 | BATTERY PACKAGING MATERIAL | LI, AIQUN | 1766 | §103 | Final Rejection | 52d overdue | Pending | Feb 14, 2023 |
| 17974464 | BATTERY PACKAGING MATERIAL | HEMINGWAY, TIMOTHY G | 1754 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Oct 26, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial