Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
6 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (50%) |
| §102 only | 2 (33%) |
| §112 only | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R | 2 | 41.4% | +24.3% |
| JENNINGS, MICHAEL DEANGILO | 1 | 77.7% | +15.1% |
| SHARMA, SHIVAM | 1 | 41.5% | +5.3% |
| MULLER, BRYAN R | 1 | 43.8% | +30.4% |
| HOLIZNA, CALEB ANDREW | 1 | 66.9% | +36.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17948212 | Front Bumper Assembly and Cleaning Robot | PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R | 512d overdue |
| 17947206 | Debris Bin Assembly, Cleaning Robot and Cleaning Robot System | PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R | 437d overdue |
| 18227724 | LIFTING DEVICE AND CLEANING APPARATUS | JENNINGS, MICHAEL DEANGILO | 23d |
| 18217456 | DUST-COLLECTING BOX AND CLEANING DEVICE | HOLIZNA, CALEB ANDREW | 70d |
| 18348580 | CLEANING ROBOT AND CLEANING SYSTEM | MULLER, BRYAN R | 75d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3723 | 3 |
| 2178 | 2 |
| 3665 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18227724 | LIFTING DEVICE AND CLEANING APPARATUS | JENNINGS, MICHAEL DEANGILO | 3723 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 23d | Pending | Jul 28, 2023 |
| 18351484 | ROBOT CONTROL METHOD, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM AND ROBOT | SHARMA, SHIVAM | 3665 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 8d | Pending | Jul 12, 2023 |
| 18348580 | CLEANING ROBOT AND CLEANING SYSTEM | MULLER, BRYAN R | 3723 | §103 | Final Rejection | 75d | Pending | Jul 07, 2023 |
| 18217456 | DUST-COLLECTING BOX AND CLEANING DEVICE | HOLIZNA, CALEB ANDREW | 3723 | §103 | Final Rejection | 70d | Pending | Jun 30, 2023 |
| 17947206 | Debris Bin Assembly, Cleaning Robot and Cleaning Robot System | PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R | 2178 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 437d overdue | Pending | Sep 19, 2022 |
| 17948212 | Front Bumper Assembly and Cleaning Robot | PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R | 2178 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 512d overdue | Pending | Sep 19, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial