Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Siemens Industry Software NV

7 pending office actions • 4 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
1
Medium (14%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (29%)
§101 + other3 (43%)
§103 only1 (14%)
§112 only1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
43% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
43% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LOWEN, NICHOLAS DANIEL 1 69.2% +80.0%
KESSLER, GREGORY AARON 1 87.0% +7.9%
SCHWARZENBERG, PAUL 1 62.0% +28.6%
GEBRESILASSIE, KIBROM K 1 72.4% +25.4%
COCCHI, MICHAEL EDWARD 1 39.9% +46.7%
GIRI, PURSOTTAM 1 19.0% +12.6%
PARK, HYUN D 1 41.2% +22.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18676816 METHOD FOR CO-SIMULATION, COMPUTER SYSTEM KESSLER, GREGORY AARON

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17767149 METHOD FOR GENERATING A COMPONENT MESH, USE OF A COMPONENT MESH, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM GIRI, PURSOTTAM 42d overdue
18000296 MACHINE LEARNING-BASED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DETERMINATION GEBRESILASSIE, KIBROM K 7d
18940826 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR GENERATING DOMAIN SPECIFIC TRAINING DATA FOR A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL LOWEN, NICHOLAS DANIEL
18266050 CO-SIMULATION, COMPUTER SYSTEM SCHWARZENBERG, PAUL
17771098 COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR SIMULATION OF TIRE PERFORMANCE COCCHI, MICHAEL EDWARD

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17767149 METHOD FOR GENERATING A COMPONENT MESH, USE OF A COMPONENT MESH, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM GIRI, PURSOTTAM 42d overdue
18000296 MACHINE LEARNING-BASED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DETERMINATION GEBRESILASSIE, KIBROM K 7d
18940826 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR GENERATING DOMAIN SPECIFIC TRAINING DATA FOR A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL LOWEN, NICHOLAS DANIEL
18266050 CO-SIMULATION, COMPUTER SYSTEM SCHWARZENBERG, PAUL
17771098 COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR SIMULATION OF TIRE PERFORMANCE COCCHI, MICHAEL EDWARD
16076741 Automotive Testing System, Method and Computer Program Product PARK, HYUN D

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2189 1
2188 1
2186 1
2857 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18940826 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR GENERATING DOMAIN SPECIFIC TRAINING DATA FOR A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL LOWEN, NICHOLAS DANIEL §101§102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 07, 2024
18676816 METHOD FOR CO-SIMULATION, COMPUTER SYSTEM KESSLER, GREGORY AARON §103 Non-Final OA Pending May 29, 2024
18266050 CO-SIMULATION, COMPUTER SYSTEM SCHWARZENBERG, PAUL §101§102 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 08, 2023
18000296 MACHINE LEARNING-BASED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DETERMINATION GEBRESILASSIE, KIBROM K 2189 §101 Final Rejection 7d Pending Nov 30, 2022
17771098 COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR SIMULATION OF TIRE PERFORMANCE COCCHI, MICHAEL EDWARD 2188 §101§112 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 22, 2022
17767149 METHOD FOR GENERATING A COMPONENT MESH, USE OF A COMPONENT MESH, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM GIRI, PURSOTTAM 2186 §101 Non-Final OA 42d overdue Pending Apr 07, 2022
16076741 Automotive Testing System, Method and Computer Program Product PARK, HYUN D 2857 §112 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 09, 2018

Managing Siemens Industry Software NV's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month