Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Silicon Integrated Systems Corp.

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 7 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
3
Communications
75% of docket
1
Semiconductors
25% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
POLO, GUSTAVO D 1 84.8% +12.7%
HALEY, JOSEPH R 1 79.1% +7.1%
SOTO LOPEZ, JOSE R 1 68.4% +4.4%
JEPPSON, PAMELA J 1 65.0% +20.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19192408 OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SETUP PROCESS OF DUAL-SCREEN DEVICE POLO, GUSTAVO D 23d overdue

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19192408 OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SETUP PROCESS OF DUAL-SCREEN DEVICE POLO, GUSTAVO D 23d overdue
17205017 CONSTANT CURRENT CHARGING DEVICE JEPPSON, PAMELA J 5d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2622 2
2621 1
2859 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19192408 OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SETUP PROCESS OF DUAL-SCREEN DEVICE POLO, GUSTAVO D 2622 §103 Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Apr 29, 2025
19190859 TOUCHPAD AND KEYBOARD INTEGRATED DEVICE HALEY, JOSEPH R 2621 §103 Non-Final OA 42d overdue Pending Apr 28, 2025
19176185 BUTTON STRUCTURE OF PROJECTED CAPACITIVE TOUCH PANEL SOTO LOPEZ, JOSE R 2622 §103 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Apr 11, 2025
17205017 CONSTANT CURRENT CHARGING DEVICE JEPPSON, PAMELA J 2859 §103 Final Rejection 5d Pending Mar 18, 2021

Managing Silicon Integrated Systems Corp.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month