Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days
Sinfonia Technology Co., Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in its patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners. The prosecution is centralized within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests that the pending applications are technically related and being reviewed by the same specialized group. The concentration of 2 pending actions in 1 distinct art unit within the Chemistry & Materials sector is significant for practitioners.
The busiest examiner for the company is PARK, EDWARD, who is currently overseeing 1 pending office action. With 2 pending actions and 2 distinct examiners, the workload is divided equally, with each examiner handling 1 action. This means PARK, EDWARD is responsible for half of the company's current pending office action responses. The 2 to 2 ratio of actions to examiners ensures that each pending matter is being independently evaluated by a different official. This distribution provides a variety of examiner perspectives on the company's intellectual property.
The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that while different examiners are involved, they likely operate under the same supervisory and unit-specific guidelines. This centralized unit structure can lead to more predictable prosecution outcomes compared to portfolios spread across multiple units. Practitioners should be prepared to manage 2 different examiner relationships while navigating the specific standards of 1 art unit. This profile represents a balanced prosecution environment where individual examiner attention is maintained within a single technical department.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (33%) |
| §102 only | 1 (33%) |
| §112 only | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PARK, EDWARD | 1 | 82.3% | +17.9% |
| MYERS, GLENN F | 1 | 77.8% | +18.8% |
| HASSAN, LIBAN M | 1 | 50.7% | +31.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18845844 | SUBSTRATE DETECTION METHOD AND LOAD PORT | PARK, EDWARD | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17619787 | CELL CULTURE DEVICE | HASSAN, LIBAN M | 28d |
| 18845844 | SUBSTRATE DETECTION METHOD AND LOAD PORT | PARK, EDWARD | — |
| 18643387 | EFEM | MYERS, GLENN F | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3652 | 1 |
| 1799 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18845844 | SUBSTRATE DETECTION METHOD AND LOAD PORT | PARK, EDWARD | — | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 10, 2024 |
| 18643387 | EFEM | MYERS, GLENN F | 3652 | §102 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 23, 2024 |
| 17619787 | CELL CULTURE DEVICE | HASSAN, LIBAN M | 1799 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 28d | Pending | Dec 16, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial