Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Examiner: PARK, EDWARD

Tech Center 2600 • Art Units: 2624 2661 2665 2666 2675

This examiner grants 82% of resolved cases

Analysis

Edward Park is an examiner in Tech Center 2600 and Art Unit 2624, with 727 resolved cases. His allowance rate of 82.3% indicates a high probability of success for patent applicants. This 82.3% rate suggests that a large majority of applications result in a grant. The 727 resolved cases provide a robust statistical foundation for understanding the prosecution landscape in this art unit.

The median days to allowance for his cases is 998. This 998-day metric provides a benchmark for the time required to reach a successful resolution. For practitioners, the 998 days to allowance is an important piece of information for managing client expectations and project timelines. This 998-day figure reflects the typical pace of prosecution within Tech Center 2600 for this examiner.

The interview lift of 17.9% highlights the value of direct communication with the examiner. This 17.9% lift suggests that applications are significantly more likely to be allowed if an interview is conducted. When combined with the 82.3% base allowance rate, the 17.9% lift underscores the effectiveness of oral advocacy. Practitioners should consider the 17.9% lift as a primary strategy for managing the 727 resolved cases in Art Unit 2624.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

82.3%
Allow Rate
+20.3% vs TC avg
747
Total Applications
+17.9%
Interview Lift
998
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 728 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

14.7%
§101 Eligibility
21.5%
§102 Novelty
53.5%
§103 Obviousness
5.2%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18652414 IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS Non-Final OA LG ELECTRONICS INC.
19036610 INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD Non-Final OA TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18675095 MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE SAME Non-Final OA FUJIFILM Corporation
18661525 IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM Final Rejection CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18685984 SIGNAL PROCESSING DEVICE, SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM Non-Final OA SONY SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
18638327 DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS FOR OUTCOME-ORIENTED PREDICTIONS Non-Final OA Washington University
18763266 PARKING LOT DETERMINATION DEVICE, CONTROL DEVICE FOR VEHICLE, AND PARKING LOT DETERMINATION METHOD Non-Final OA DENSO CORPORATION
18908040 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERCEIVING TRAFFIC ROAD ENVIRONMENT BASED ON GRAPH REPRESENTATION FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING Non-Final OA Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
18847605 REAL TIME AUTOMATED NERVE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM Non-Final OA THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
18746213 CUSTOMIZED PROTOTYPE BASED TRAINING FOR EMBEDDING CLASSIFICATIONS Non-Final OA AUTOBRAINS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
17766439 IMAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF Non-Final OA New York Stem Cell Foundation, Inc.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month