Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Softeye Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications

8 pending office actions • 3 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Softeye Inc. manages a portfolio in the Communications technology area with 8 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 8 distinct examiners, which means every pending matter is being handled by a different individual. The workload is spread across 3 distinct art units, indicating that the company's communications technologies are being reviewed by several different specialized groups.

SHIRLEY D. HICKS is the busiest examiner, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Since the total pending office actions is 8, the busiest examiner pending count of 1 shows that the work is distributed, with no single examiner handling more than one case. This high number of 8 distinct examiners for the pending actions suggests a very diverse prosecution landscape.

The use of 3 distinct art units for the pending office actions implies that multiple applications are grouped within the same technical divisions. However, the distinct examiners ensure that each active matter receives a unique perspective. For a company in the Communications sector, managing these separate reviewers across the 3 distinct art units requires significant coordination to maintain consistency.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
3
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (50%)
§103 only2 (25%)
§102 only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
2
Communications
25% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
5
Business / Other
62% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HICKS, SHIRLEY D. 1 60.8% +50.5%
CORRIELUS, JEAN M 1 84.0% +12.5%
GILLIARD, DELOMIA L 1 89.6% +10.4%
AKHAVANNIK, HADI 1 85.9% +13.1%
YANG, JIANXUN 1 74.1% +19.3%
BAYNES, SAMUEL DAVID 1 90.0% +16.7%
MASTERS, KRISTEN MICHELLE 1 64.7% +24.1%
DEMETER, HILINA K 1 72.1% +18.8%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18745462 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE FOR USER-SPECIFIC GENERATIVE INTELLIGENCE MASTERS, KRISTEN MICHELLE 2d overdue
19081911 FOUNDATION MODEL PIPELINE FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED DEVICES CORRIELUS, JEAN M —
18983220 MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-POWER APPLICATIONS GILLIARD, DELOMIA L —
18983242 MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-POWER APPLICATIONS AKHAVANNIK, HADI —
18983169 MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-POWER APPLICATIONS BAYNES, SAMUEL DAVID —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19081951 FOUNDATION MODEL PIPELINE FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED DEVICES HICKS, SHIRLEY D. 98d overdue
18745462 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE FOR USER-SPECIFIC GENERATIVE INTELLIGENCE MASTERS, KRISTEN MICHELLE 2d overdue
19081911 FOUNDATION MODEL PIPELINE FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED DEVICES CORRIELUS, JEAN M —
18983220 MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-POWER APPLICATIONS GILLIARD, DELOMIA L —
18983242 MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-POWER APPLICATIONS AKHAVANNIK, HADI —
18983261 MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-POWER APPLICATIONS YANG, JIANXUN —
18983169 MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-POWER APPLICATIONS BAYNES, SAMUEL DAVID —
18613100 APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR AUGMENTING VISION WITH REGION-OF-INTEREST BASED PROCESSING DEMETER, HILINA K —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2168 1
2659 1
2617 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19081951 FOUNDATION MODEL PIPELINE FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED DEVICES HICKS, SHIRLEY D. 2168 §102 Final Rejection 98d overdue Pending Mar 17, 2025
19081911 FOUNDATION MODEL PIPELINE FOR REAL-TIME EMBEDDED DEVICES CORRIELUS, JEAN M — §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 17, 2025
18983220 MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-POWER APPLICATIONS GILLIARD, DELOMIA L — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18983242 MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-POWER APPLICATIONS AKHAVANNIK, HADI — §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18983261 MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-POWER APPLICATIONS YANG, JIANXUN — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18983169 MACHINE-LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-POWER APPLICATIONS BAYNES, SAMUEL DAVID — §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18745462 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE FOR USER-SPECIFIC GENERATIVE INTELLIGENCE MASTERS, KRISTEN MICHELLE 2659 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Jun 17, 2024
18613100 APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR AUGMENTING VISION WITH REGION-OF-INTEREST BASED PROCESSING DEMETER, HILINA K 2617 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 21, 2024

Managing Softeye Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month