Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Sofusa Holdings LLC

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sofusa Holdings LLC has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions involve 3 distinct examiners. The workload is distributed across 2 distinct art units, indicating some level of organizational variety in the prosecution process. This spread suggests that the company's technology may bridge different technical classifications within the patent office's structure, requiring engagement with multiple administrative groups.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 3 pending actions and 3 distinct examiners, each examiner is currently managing exactly 1 action. This parity across the examiner pool suggests a broad spread of the company's active legal matters. Practitioners should be prepared to navigate the differing expectations of multiple examiners across these two art units in the medical device sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
1
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (25%)
1
Unknown (25%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)
No statute on record1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VU, QUYNH-NHU HOANG 1 68.5% +27.4%
STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE 1 85.7% +33.3%
PRICE, NATHAN R 1 53.4% +38.9%
AHMED, TASNIM M 1 81.1% +5.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18568260 METHOD OF TREATING CANCER BY ADMINISTRATION OF AN ANTI-PD-1 OR ANTI-PD-L1 THERAPEUTIC AGENT VIA A LYMPHATIC MICRONEEDLE DELIVERY DEVICE STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17784994 FLUID DELIVERY APPARATUS WITH MICRONEEDLES PRICE, NATHAN R 27d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17784994 FLUID DELIVERY APPARATUS WITH MICRONEEDLES PRICE, NATHAN R 27d
18622067 METHODS FOR BETTER DELIVERY OF ACTIVE AGENTS TO TUMORS VU, QUYNH-NHU HOANG —
18568260 METHOD OF TREATING CANCER BY ADMINISTRATION OF AN ANTI-PD-1 OR ANTI-PD-L1 THERAPEUTIC AGENT VIA A LYMPHATIC MICRONEEDLE DELIVERY DEVICE STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 2
1645 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18622067 METHODS FOR BETTER DELIVERY OF ACTIVE AGENTS TO TUMORS VU, QUYNH-NHU HOANG — §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 29, 2024
18568260 METHOD OF TREATING CANCER BY ADMINISTRATION OF AN ANTI-PD-1 OR ANTI-PD-L1 THERAPEUTIC AGENT VIA A LYMPHATIC MICRONEEDLE DELIVERY DEVICE STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE 1645 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 07, 2023
17784994 FLUID DELIVERY APPARATUS WITH MICRONEEDLES PRICE, NATHAN R 3783 §103§112 Final Rejection 27d Pending Jun 13, 2022
17464402 MEDICAL DEVICES FOR DELIVERY OF siRNA AHMED, TASNIM M 3783 Other Non-Final OA 367d overdue Pending Sep 01, 2021

Managing Sofusa Holdings LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month