Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Spp Technologies Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Computing & Software • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Spp Technologies Co. Ltd. is managing 4 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The data indicates a distributed workload, as there are 4 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units involved for the 4 pending office actions. This means every pending office action is assigned to a different examiner and resides in a different art unit. Such a distribution requires a broad approach to prosecution strategy, as the 4 pending office actions are spread across multiple specialized groups within the patent office.

WORKU, KIDEST is identified as the busiest examiner for this company, though this individual is responsible for only 1 pending office action. Because each of the 4 pending office actions is with a different examiner, no single official has a dominant influence over the portfolio's current trajectory. The presence of 4 distinct art units for only 4 pending office actions suggests that the company's innovations cover a diverse range of technical sub-sectors. Practitioners must manage 4 different examiner relationships to address these 4 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
50% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WORKU, KIDEST 1 84.9% +2.8%
DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P. 1 72.2% +19.6%
MOORE, KARLA A 1 43.1% +14.0%
GATES, ERIC ANDREW 1 78.8% +14.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18579782 Program, Information Processing Method, Information Processing Device and Model Generation Method WORKU, KIDEST 16d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17429643 METHOD OF IGNITING PLASMA AND PLASMA GENERATING SYSTEM MOORE, KARLA A —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17923931 PLASMA PROCESSING METHOD USING A MIXED PLASMA PROCESSING GAS OF C4F8 AND 2,3,3,3- TETRAFLUOROPROPENE DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P. 12d
17429643 METHOD OF IGNITING PLASMA AND PLASMA GENERATING SYSTEM MOORE, KARLA A —
17251859 ABNORMALITY DETECTION APPARATUS GATES, ERIC ANDREW —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2119 1
1713 1
1716 1
3722 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18579782 Program, Information Processing Method, Information Processing Device and Model Generation Method WORKU, KIDEST 2119 §103 Non-Final OA 16d Pending Jan 16, 2024
17923931 PLASMA PROCESSING METHOD USING A MIXED PLASMA PROCESSING GAS OF C4F8 AND 2,3,3,3- TETRAFLUOROPROPENE DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P. 1713 §103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Nov 08, 2022
17429643 METHOD OF IGNITING PLASMA AND PLASMA GENERATING SYSTEM MOORE, KARLA A 1716 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 10, 2021
17251859 ABNORMALITY DETECTION APPARATUS GATES, ERIC ANDREW 3722 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 14, 2020

Managing Spp Technologies Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month