Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Superior Industries, Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Superior Industries, Inc. has 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 3 pending office actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This indicates a relatively concentrated prosecution landscape for the company's current filings. The involvement of 2 distinct art units indicates that the technology is being reviewed in different specialized groups.

The busiest examiner, AWAIS, MUHAMMAD SUMRAIZ, is handling 2 busiest examiner pending actions. This means that AWAIS, MUHAMMAD SUMRAIZ is responsible for a portion of the company's 3 pending office actions. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of AWAIS, MUHAMMAD SUMRAIZ, as this individual manages 2 of the active matters. The 2 distinct examiners provide different perspectives within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area.

Managing 3 pending office actions across 2 distinct art units requires coordination to ensure consistent claim language. Practitioners can use the feedback from the 2 distinct examiners to refine their prosecution strategy. The 2 busiest examiner pending actions handled by AWAIS, MUHAMMAD SUMRAIZ provide a specific focus area within the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
33% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AWAIS, MUHAMMAD SUMRAIZ 2 82.1% +9.6%
CARTER, CHRISTOPHER W 1 74.8% +20.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19190351 CONVEYOR LOADING ZONE IMPACT CRADLE AND CONVEYOR WITH LOADING ZONE IMPACT CRADLE AWAIS, MUHAMMAD SUMRAIZ —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18312476 AGGREGATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS CARTER, CHRISTOPHER W 26d
19139754 CONVEYOR PULLEY SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS AWAIS, MUHAMMAD SUMRAIZ —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18312476 AGGREGATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS CARTER, CHRISTOPHER W 26d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3651 2
2117 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19139754 CONVEYOR PULLEY SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS AWAIS, MUHAMMAD SUMRAIZ 3651 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 16, 2025
19190351 CONVEYOR LOADING ZONE IMPACT CRADLE AND CONVEYOR WITH LOADING ZONE IMPACT CRADLE AWAIS, MUHAMMAD SUMRAIZ 3651 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 25, 2025
18312476 AGGREGATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS CARTER, CHRISTOPHER W 2117 §102§103 Final Rejection 26d Pending May 04, 2023

Managing Superior Industries, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Superior Industries, Inc. have?

Superior Industries, Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Superior Industries, Inc. applications?

Muhammad Sumraiz Awais has the most, with 2 of Superior Industries, Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Superior Industries, Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month