Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Takemoto Yushi Kabushiki Kaisha

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Takemoto Yushi Kabushiki Kaisha maintains a company patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio currently includes 3 pending office actions. These 3 pending office actions are spread across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. This one-to-one-to-one relationship between actions, examiners, and units indicates a highly diversified prosecution landscape where each case is handled by a different individual in a different department.

MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there are 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, the workload is perfectly balanced. The 3 distinct art units suggest that the company's chemical research is being examined in three separate specialized areas at the USPTO, requiring tailored strategies for each unit.

For a patent practitioner, managing 3 pending office actions across 3 distinct examiners requires handling three different examiner styles. No single examiner has an outsized influence on the portfolio, as shown by the 1 busiest examiner pending office action count. The presence of 3 distinct art units means the company must navigate the specific standards of three different technical groups.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
1
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T 1 53.9% +30.2%
SINGH-PANDEY, ARTI R 1 70.6% +8.9%
KHAN, AMINA S 1 47.5% +43.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18684937 SIZING AGENT FOR INORGANIC FIBER AND INORGANIC FIBER MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T 47d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18565600 SYNTHETIC FIBER PROCESSING AGENT, AND SYNTHETIC FIBER KHAN, AMINA S 27d
18684937 SIZING AGENT FOR INORGANIC FIBER AND INORGANIC FIBER MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T 47d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1789 1
1759 1
1761 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18684937 SIZING AGENT FOR INORGANIC FIBER AND INORGANIC FIBER MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T 1789 §102§103 Non-Final OA 47d Pending Feb 20, 2024
18567579 SIZING AGENT FOR INORGANIC FIBERS, INORGANIC FIBERS, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND COMPOSITE MATERIAL SINGH-PANDEY, ARTI R 1759 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Dec 06, 2023
18565600 SYNTHETIC FIBER PROCESSING AGENT, AND SYNTHETIC FIBER KHAN, AMINA S 1761 §112 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Nov 30, 2023

Managing Takemoto Yushi Kabushiki Kaisha's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month