Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
7 pending office actions • 6 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 6 (86%) |
| §102 only | 1 (14%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GANCI, MATTHEW JOSEPH | 1 | 94.8% | -5.7% |
| FOLLMAN, BRODIE J | 1 | 73.0% | +10.7% |
| PALMARCHUK, BRIAN KEITH | 1 | 73.3% | +16.7% |
| HARTMANN, ERIN MARIE | 1 | 66.7% | +22.9% |
| TSUI, ALFRED H | 1 | 31.1% | +33.8% |
| SLOWIK, ELIZABETH J | 1 | 47.1% | +9.3% |
| LOWE, MICHAEL S | 1 | 66.5% | +20.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18953229 | Working Vehicle | GANCI, MATTHEW JOSEPH | 26d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18376036 | WORKING VEHICLE | TSUI, ALFRED H | 50d overdue |
| 18812004 | Operation Control System Of Working Vehicle | FOLLMAN, BRODIE J | 5d |
| 18769593 | WORKING VEHICLE AND CONTROL METHOD FOR WORKING VEHICLE | PALMARCHUK, BRIAN KEITH | 8d |
| 18223129 | WORKING VEHICLE | LOWE, MICHAEL S | 26d |
| 18751512 | WORKING VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING WORKING VEHICLE | HARTMANN, ERIN MARIE | 56d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3669 | 2 |
| 3614 | 1 |
| 3664 | 1 |
| 3671 | 1 |
| 3662 | 1 |
| 3652 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18953229 | Working Vehicle | GANCI, MATTHEW JOSEPH | 3614 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | Nov 20, 2024 |
| 18812004 | Operation Control System Of Working Vehicle | FOLLMAN, BRODIE J | 3669 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 5d | Pending | Aug 22, 2024 |
| 18769593 | WORKING VEHICLE AND CONTROL METHOD FOR WORKING VEHICLE | PALMARCHUK, BRIAN KEITH | 3669 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | Jul 11, 2024 |
| 18751512 | WORKING VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING WORKING VEHICLE | HARTMANN, ERIN MARIE | 3664 | §103 | Final Rejection | 56d | Pending | Jun 24, 2024 |
| 18376036 | WORKING VEHICLE | TSUI, ALFRED H | 3671 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 50d overdue | Pending | Oct 03, 2023 |
| 18231821 | WORKING VEHICLE INCLUDING A CONTROLLER WITH AN INERTIAL SENSOR FOR CONTROLLING HYDRAULIC PUMPS | SLOWIK, ELIZABETH J | 3662 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 49d overdue | Pending | Aug 09, 2023 |
| 18223129 | WORKING VEHICLE | LOWE, MICHAEL S | 3652 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | Jul 18, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial