Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Texas Heart Institute

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Texas Heart Institute currently manages 4 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct art units, indicating a portfolio that spans multiple specialized examination groups. The workload involves 4 distinct examiners, showing that each action is assigned to a different individual. This distribution requires the legal team to monitor several different examination styles simultaneously.

KHADIJEH A VAHDAT is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 pending action. This specific workload suggests that no single examiner is overwhelmed by the institute's current filings. Practitioners should prepare for varied examination outcomes given the involvement of 3 different art units. The presence of 4 pending office actions across 4 distinct examiners means that prosecution strategies must be tailored to several different individuals. This diversity in examiners and art units suggests a need for a flexible approach to patent prosecution for the institute.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
§102 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
60% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VAHDAT, KHADIJEH A 1 79.5% +20.1%
YOO, SUN JAE 1 71.1% +0.3%
SAHAND, SANA 1 63.4% +23.8%
BARSKY, JARED 1 50.2% +22.7%
ARIETI, RUTH SOPHIA 1 46.7% +71.1%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18037029 SUPPRESSING HIPPO SIGNALING IN THE STEM CELL NICHE PROMOTES SKELETAL MUSCLE REGENERATION ARIETI, RUTH SOPHIA 21d
19099446 Tool and Method for Cardiac Ablation Using Hydrogel VAHDAT, KHADIJEH A —
18292464 ISOFORM SPECIFIC AGONISTS TARGETING AKT KINASE BARSKY, JARED —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18037029 SUPPRESSING HIPPO SIGNALING IN THE STEM CELL NICHE PROMOTES SKELETAL MUSCLE REGENERATION ARIETI, RUTH SOPHIA 21d
19099446 Tool and Method for Cardiac Ablation Using Hydrogel VAHDAT, KHADIJEH A —
18294893 PHRENIC NERVE PACING DEVICE SAHAND, SANA —
18292464 ISOFORM SPECIFIC AGONISTS TARGETING AKT KINASE BARSKY, JARED —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1621 1
3796 1
1628 1
1635 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19099446 Tool and Method for Cardiac Ablation Using Hydrogel VAHDAT, KHADIJEH A — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 28, 2025
18682681 PIPERAZINE-BASED AGONISTS OF LFA-1 AND VLA-4 YOO, SUN JAE 1621 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2024
18294893 PHRENIC NERVE PACING DEVICE SAHAND, SANA 3796 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 02, 2024
18292464 ISOFORM SPECIFIC AGONISTS TARGETING AKT KINASE BARSKY, JARED 1628 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 26, 2024
18037029 SUPPRESSING HIPPO SIGNALING IN THE STEM CELL NICHE PROMOTES SKELETAL MUSCLE REGENERATION ARIETI, RUTH SOPHIA 1635 §103§112Other Final Rejection 21d Pending May 15, 2023

Managing Texas Heart Institute's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month