Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Texas State University

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Texas State University has 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are being handled by 3 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This distribution shows that the university's mechanical and transportation research is being reviewed by multiple specialized teams. The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the portfolio covers different sub-disciplines, requiring the university to adapt to different examination styles within the broader technology area.

The busiest examiner, MCPHERSON, JAMES M, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Given the total of 3 pending actions, each examiner is managing exactly one case. This means the university's current prosecution is spread across 3 distinct examiners. Practitioners should carefully track the pending office actions to ensure that the arguments presented to one examiner do not conflict with those presented to the others in the 2 distinct art units. This coordination is necessary to maintain a consistent prosecution history within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCPHERSON, JAMES M 1 82.2% +17.3%
SHAH, UTPAL D 1 87.9% +11.3%
KINGDON, CATHY 1 80.3% +2.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19032386 GENERATING SAFEST ROUTE BASED ON ROAD NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES MCPHERSON, JAMES M —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17965436 MODULATING STRESS RESPONSES BY A NOVEL CHROMATIN-ASSOCIATED GUIDE RNA DERIVED FROM TRANSFER RNA KINGDON, CATHY 24d overdue
18911537 EMOTION PORTRAYAL DATABASE SHAH, UTPAL D —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19032386 GENERATING SAFEST ROUTE BASED ON ROAD NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES MCPHERSON, JAMES M —
18911537 EMOTION PORTRAYAL DATABASE SHAH, UTPAL D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3663 1
1663 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19032386 GENERATING SAFEST ROUTE BASED ON ROAD NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES MCPHERSON, JAMES M 3663 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 20, 2025
18911537 EMOTION PORTRAYAL DATABASE SHAH, UTPAL D — §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 10, 2024
17965436 MODULATING STRESS RESPONSES BY A NOVEL CHROMATIN-ASSOCIATED GUIDE RNA DERIVED FROM TRANSFER RNA KINGDON, CATHY 1663 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 24d overdue Pending Oct 13, 2022

Managing Texas State University's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month